TY - JOUR
T1 - Measurement, correlation, and mapping of Glacial Lake Algonquin shorelines in northern Michigan
AU - Schaetzl, Randall J.
AU - Drzyzga, Scott A.
AU - Weisenborn, Beth N.
AU - Kincare, Kevin A.
AU - Lepczyk, Xiomara C.
AU - Shein, Karsten
AU - Dowd, Cathryn M.
AU - Linker, John
N1 - Funding Information:
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant no. 9819148. The Michigan State University (MSU) College of Social Science and Department of Geography provided funding for the production costs of the article. We express our appreciation to Frank Krist for field and cartographic assistance, Dave Lusch and Bob Goodwin of the Center for Remote Sensing and GIS at MSU for th e use of a GPS unit and for training us on that unit, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources for the use of a GPS unit, and the Michigan Geological Survey for information and equipment support. We also thank Gary Weissmann, Tiffiny Rossi, and Leah Merz for help in the field, Sean Savage for technical assistance, and Todd Thompson and Alan Arbogast for advice and consultation. Reviews of an earlier version of the manussript by Alan Kehew and William Blewett improved it markedly.
PY - 2002/9
Y1 - 2002/9
N2 - Glacial Lake Algonquin, the most widespread proglacial lake in the Great Lakes basin, attained a high (Main) stage at about 11,000 B.P., at which time it developed a conspicuous shoreline. Several lower, less obvious Algonquin shorelines also exist. Previous research on this lake has involved three drawbacks: (1) imprecise methods of establishing the location and elevation of shoreline features, (2) misidentification of some offshore coastal landforms as beach ridges, and (3) tenuous and difficult correlation of named shorelines across wide distances. We believe that more than one name is used for some lake phases, making correlation difficult. Our study focused on these problems by surveying and mapping 160 Algonquin wave-cut bluffs throughout northern Michigan. We utilized global positioning system (GPS) technology to precisely record the three-dimensional positions of the bases of these bluffs and statistically fit trend surfaces to these positions. Classification of bluff data indicates that four strong Algonquin shorelines exist in the region, for which we recommend these names: Main, Ardtrea, Wyebridge, and Payette. Weak evidence for a possible fifth, lower shoreline was observed at five locations. Maps of the landscape during each lake phase were created, revealing islands not previously recognized. Rebound curves and maps of the lake during each phase, using the positional data set, indicate that isostatic rebound in the study area appears to be greatest in the northeast sector.
AB - Glacial Lake Algonquin, the most widespread proglacial lake in the Great Lakes basin, attained a high (Main) stage at about 11,000 B.P., at which time it developed a conspicuous shoreline. Several lower, less obvious Algonquin shorelines also exist. Previous research on this lake has involved three drawbacks: (1) imprecise methods of establishing the location and elevation of shoreline features, (2) misidentification of some offshore coastal landforms as beach ridges, and (3) tenuous and difficult correlation of named shorelines across wide distances. We believe that more than one name is used for some lake phases, making correlation difficult. Our study focused on these problems by surveying and mapping 160 Algonquin wave-cut bluffs throughout northern Michigan. We utilized global positioning system (GPS) technology to precisely record the three-dimensional positions of the bases of these bluffs and statistically fit trend surfaces to these positions. Classification of bluff data indicates that four strong Algonquin shorelines exist in the region, for which we recommend these names: Main, Ardtrea, Wyebridge, and Payette. Weak evidence for a possible fifth, lower shoreline was observed at five locations. Maps of the landscape during each lake phase were created, revealing islands not previously recognized. Rebound curves and maps of the lake during each phase, using the positional data set, indicate that isostatic rebound in the study area appears to be greatest in the northeast sector.
KW - Field mapping
KW - Glacial lakes
KW - GPS
KW - Isostatic rebound
KW - Quaternary geology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242519365&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0242519365&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1467-8306.00296
DO - 10.1111/1467-8306.00296
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:0242519365
SN - 0004-5608
VL - 92
SP - 399
EP - 415
JO - Annals of the Association of American Geographers
JF - Annals of the Association of American Geographers
IS - 3
ER -