TY - JOUR
T1 - Matter imprints in waveform models for neutron star binaries
T2 - Tidal and self-spin effects
AU - Dietrich, Tim
AU - Khan, Sebastian
AU - Dudi, Reetika
AU - Kapadia, Shasvath J.
AU - Kumar, Prayush
AU - Nagar, Alessandro
AU - Ohme, Frank
AU - Pannarale, Francesco
AU - Samajdar, Anuradha
AU - Bernuzzi, Sebastiano
AU - Carullo, Gregorio
AU - Del Pozzo, Walter
AU - Haney, Maria
AU - Markakis, Charalampos
AU - Pürrer, Michael
AU - Riemenschneider, Gunnar
AU - Setyawati, Yoshinta Eka
AU - Tsang, Ka Wa
AU - Van Den Broeck, Chris
N1 - Funding Information:
We want to thank Nathan Johnson-McDaniel for his participation in the LIGO review process of the NRTidal models, in particular for his checks of the merger frequency and comparisons to BBH systems and NR waveforms. We also thank Tanja Hinderer for her work on the review of the PhenomPv2_NRTidal model and Francesco Messina for carefully cross-checking the implementation of the self-spin terms in the model. We also thank Sergei Ossokine for helpful discussions about precessing compact binary systems. We thank Alessandra Buonanno, Nathan Johnson-McDaniel, and Noah Sennett for comments on the manuscript. T. D. acknowledges support by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Grant Agreement No. 749145, BNSmergers. P. K. acknowledges support at Cornell from the Sherman Fairchild Foundation and NSF Grants No. PHY-1306125 and No. AST-1333129. F. P. acknowledges support from Cardiff University Seedcorn Funding AH21101018. S. B. acknowledges support by the EU H2020 under ERC Starting Grant No. BinGraSp-714626. C. M. acknowledges support by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Grant Agreement No. 753115, ACFD. K. W. T., A. S., T. D. and C. V. D. B. are supported by the research programme of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO). S. K., F. O. and Y. S. are supported by the Max Planck Society’s Independent Research Group Grant. M. H. acknowledges support by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF). F. P. acknowledges support by Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) Grant No. ST/L000962/1 and European Research Council Consolidator Grant No. 647839. R. D. has been supported by the DFG Research Training Group 1523/2 “Quantum and Gravitational Fields”. Computations of the numerical relativity waveforms have been performed performed on the supercomputer SuperMUC at the LRZ (Munich) under the Project No. pr48pu, the compute cluster Minerva of the Max-Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics, and on the Hydra and Draco clusters of the Max Planck Computing and Data Facility.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Physical Society.
PY - 2019/1/15
Y1 - 2019/1/15
N2 - The combined observation of gravitational and electromagnetic waves from the coalescence of two neutron stars marks the beginning of multimessenger astronomy with gravitational waves (GWs). The development of accurate gravitational waveform models is a crucial prerequisite to extract information about the properties of the binary system that generated a detected GW signal. In binary neutron star systems (BNS), tidal effects also need to be incorporated in the modeling for an accurate waveform representation. Building on previous work [Phys. Rev. D 96, 121501 (2017)PRVDAQ2470-001010.1103/PhysRevD.96.121501], we explore the performance of inspiral-merger waveform models that are obtained by adding a numerical relativity (NR) based approximant for the tidal part of the phasing (NRTidal) to existing models for nonprecessing and precessing binary black hole systems, as implemented in the LSC Algorithm Library Suite. The resulting BNS waveforms are compared and contrasted to a set of target waveforms which we obtain by hybridizing NR waveforms (covering the last ∼10 orbits up to the merger and extending through the postmerger phase) with inspiral waveforms calculated from 30 Hz obtained with a state-of-the-art effective-one-body waveform model. While due to the construction procedure of the target waveforms, there is no error budget available over the full frequency range accessible by advanced GW detectors, the waveform set presents only an approximation of the real signal. We probe that the combination of the self-spin terms and of the NRTidal description is necessary to obtain minimal mismatches (0.01) and phase differences (1 rad) with respect to the target waveforms. We also discuss possible improvements and drawbacks of the NRTidal approximant in its current form.
AB - The combined observation of gravitational and electromagnetic waves from the coalescence of two neutron stars marks the beginning of multimessenger astronomy with gravitational waves (GWs). The development of accurate gravitational waveform models is a crucial prerequisite to extract information about the properties of the binary system that generated a detected GW signal. In binary neutron star systems (BNS), tidal effects also need to be incorporated in the modeling for an accurate waveform representation. Building on previous work [Phys. Rev. D 96, 121501 (2017)PRVDAQ2470-001010.1103/PhysRevD.96.121501], we explore the performance of inspiral-merger waveform models that are obtained by adding a numerical relativity (NR) based approximant for the tidal part of the phasing (NRTidal) to existing models for nonprecessing and precessing binary black hole systems, as implemented in the LSC Algorithm Library Suite. The resulting BNS waveforms are compared and contrasted to a set of target waveforms which we obtain by hybridizing NR waveforms (covering the last ∼10 orbits up to the merger and extending through the postmerger phase) with inspiral waveforms calculated from 30 Hz obtained with a state-of-the-art effective-one-body waveform model. While due to the construction procedure of the target waveforms, there is no error budget available over the full frequency range accessible by advanced GW detectors, the waveform set presents only an approximation of the real signal. We probe that the combination of the self-spin terms and of the NRTidal description is necessary to obtain minimal mismatches (0.01) and phase differences (1 rad) with respect to the target waveforms. We also discuss possible improvements and drawbacks of the NRTidal approximant in its current form.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060852367&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060852367&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.024029
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.024029
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85060852367
SN - 2470-0010
VL - 99
JO - Physical Review D
JF - Physical Review D
IS - 2
M1 - 024029
ER -