Mathematical modeling of multiphase flow in steel continuous casting

Hyunjin Yang, Surya Pratap Vanka, Brian G. Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

This paper reviews multiphase flow models for continuous casting of steel from classical models to recent methods. These multiphase flow models are classified into six groups in this paper: quasi-multiphase models, multi-fluid models, moving grid methods, interface tracking methods, particle based models/ methods and hybrid models. For each model, the governing equations are summarized and the inherent advantages and disadvantages are discussed. Example applications of each model are presented from previous literature, illustrating typical results and accuracy that can be obtained. The objective of this paper is to guide readers to choose an appropriate multiphase flow model for their application. Argon gas bubble effects on the flow pattern can be modeled with simple mixture models, Eulerian-Eulerian models, Multiple size group models which also track bubble size distributions, and Discrete-Phase Models (DPM). Gas pockets and slug flow, which can occur inside the nozzle are more complex, and hybrid models which combine different models together, such as Eulerian-Eulerian, level-set, Volume of Fluid (VOF), and DPM, appear promising. The shape of the slag/steel interfacial profile, level fluctuations, and slag entrainment can be modeled with free surface methods, such as moving grid, VOF, or other interface tracking methods. Particle transport and entrapment, including inclusions and gas bubbles can be added via DPM models and also require a capture criterion model. Solidification and meniscus phenomena require flow models coupled with heat transfer and solidification.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)956-972
Number of pages17
JournalISIJ International
Volume59
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Steel
Multiphase flow
Continuous casting
Gases
Slags
Fluids
Solidification

Keywords

  • Argon gas
  • Hybrid models
  • Interface
  • Momentum interaction
  • Particle based methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Metals and Alloys
  • Materials Chemistry

Cite this

Mathematical modeling of multiphase flow in steel continuous casting. / Yang, Hyunjin; Vanka, Surya Pratap; Thomas, Brian G.

In: ISIJ International, Vol. 59, No. 6, 01.01.2019, p. 956-972.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Yang, Hyunjin ; Vanka, Surya Pratap ; Thomas, Brian G. / Mathematical modeling of multiphase flow in steel continuous casting. In: ISIJ International. 2019 ; Vol. 59, No. 6. pp. 956-972.
@article{90140176cb0841288740888c7095dec1,
title = "Mathematical modeling of multiphase flow in steel continuous casting",
abstract = "This paper reviews multiphase flow models for continuous casting of steel from classical models to recent methods. These multiphase flow models are classified into six groups in this paper: quasi-multiphase models, multi-fluid models, moving grid methods, interface tracking methods, particle based models/ methods and hybrid models. For each model, the governing equations are summarized and the inherent advantages and disadvantages are discussed. Example applications of each model are presented from previous literature, illustrating typical results and accuracy that can be obtained. The objective of this paper is to guide readers to choose an appropriate multiphase flow model for their application. Argon gas bubble effects on the flow pattern can be modeled with simple mixture models, Eulerian-Eulerian models, Multiple size group models which also track bubble size distributions, and Discrete-Phase Models (DPM). Gas pockets and slug flow, which can occur inside the nozzle are more complex, and hybrid models which combine different models together, such as Eulerian-Eulerian, level-set, Volume of Fluid (VOF), and DPM, appear promising. The shape of the slag/steel interfacial profile, level fluctuations, and slag entrainment can be modeled with free surface methods, such as moving grid, VOF, or other interface tracking methods. Particle transport and entrapment, including inclusions and gas bubbles can be added via DPM models and also require a capture criterion model. Solidification and meniscus phenomena require flow models coupled with heat transfer and solidification.",
keywords = "Argon gas, Hybrid models, Interface, Momentum interaction, Particle based methods",
author = "Hyunjin Yang and Vanka, {Surya Pratap} and Thomas, {Brian G.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2018-743",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "956--972",
journal = "ISIJ International",
issn = "0915-1559",
publisher = "Iron and Steel Institute of Japan",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mathematical modeling of multiphase flow in steel continuous casting

AU - Yang, Hyunjin

AU - Vanka, Surya Pratap

AU - Thomas, Brian G.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - This paper reviews multiphase flow models for continuous casting of steel from classical models to recent methods. These multiphase flow models are classified into six groups in this paper: quasi-multiphase models, multi-fluid models, moving grid methods, interface tracking methods, particle based models/ methods and hybrid models. For each model, the governing equations are summarized and the inherent advantages and disadvantages are discussed. Example applications of each model are presented from previous literature, illustrating typical results and accuracy that can be obtained. The objective of this paper is to guide readers to choose an appropriate multiphase flow model for their application. Argon gas bubble effects on the flow pattern can be modeled with simple mixture models, Eulerian-Eulerian models, Multiple size group models which also track bubble size distributions, and Discrete-Phase Models (DPM). Gas pockets and slug flow, which can occur inside the nozzle are more complex, and hybrid models which combine different models together, such as Eulerian-Eulerian, level-set, Volume of Fluid (VOF), and DPM, appear promising. The shape of the slag/steel interfacial profile, level fluctuations, and slag entrainment can be modeled with free surface methods, such as moving grid, VOF, or other interface tracking methods. Particle transport and entrapment, including inclusions and gas bubbles can be added via DPM models and also require a capture criterion model. Solidification and meniscus phenomena require flow models coupled with heat transfer and solidification.

AB - This paper reviews multiphase flow models for continuous casting of steel from classical models to recent methods. These multiphase flow models are classified into six groups in this paper: quasi-multiphase models, multi-fluid models, moving grid methods, interface tracking methods, particle based models/ methods and hybrid models. For each model, the governing equations are summarized and the inherent advantages and disadvantages are discussed. Example applications of each model are presented from previous literature, illustrating typical results and accuracy that can be obtained. The objective of this paper is to guide readers to choose an appropriate multiphase flow model for their application. Argon gas bubble effects on the flow pattern can be modeled with simple mixture models, Eulerian-Eulerian models, Multiple size group models which also track bubble size distributions, and Discrete-Phase Models (DPM). Gas pockets and slug flow, which can occur inside the nozzle are more complex, and hybrid models which combine different models together, such as Eulerian-Eulerian, level-set, Volume of Fluid (VOF), and DPM, appear promising. The shape of the slag/steel interfacial profile, level fluctuations, and slag entrainment can be modeled with free surface methods, such as moving grid, VOF, or other interface tracking methods. Particle transport and entrapment, including inclusions and gas bubbles can be added via DPM models and also require a capture criterion model. Solidification and meniscus phenomena require flow models coupled with heat transfer and solidification.

KW - Argon gas

KW - Hybrid models

KW - Interface

KW - Momentum interaction

KW - Particle based methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069051379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069051379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2018-743

DO - 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2018-743

M3 - Review article

VL - 59

SP - 956

EP - 972

JO - ISIJ International

JF - ISIJ International

SN - 0915-1559

IS - 6

ER -