Masking auditory feedback does not eliminate repetition reduction

Cassandra L. Jacobs, Torrey M. Loucks, Duane G. Watson, Gary S. Dell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Repetition reduces word duration. Explanations of this process have appealed to audience design, internal production mechanisms, and combinations thereof [e.g. Kahn, J. M., & Arnold, J. E. (2015). Articulatory and lexical repetition effects on durational reduction: Speaker experience vs. common ground. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 103–119]. Jacobs, Yiu, Watson, and Dell [2015. Why are repeated words produced with reduced durations? Evidence from inner speech and homophone production. Journal of Memory and Language, 84, 37–48] proposed the auditory feedback hypothesis, which states that speakers must hear a word, produced either by themselves or another speaker, in order for duration reduction on a subsequent production. We conducted a strong test of the auditory feedback hypothesis in two experiments, in which we used masked auditory feedback and whispering to prevent speakers from hearing themselves fully. Both experiments showed that despite limiting the sources of normal auditory feedback, repetition reduction was observed to equal extents in masked and unmasked conditions, suggesting that repetition reduction may be supported by multiple sources, such as somatosensory feedback and feedforward signals, depending on their availability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalLanguage, Cognition and Neuroscience
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Language
experiment
Neurosciences
neurosciences
language
Cognition
Hearing
cognition
Auditory Feedback
Masking
evidence
experience
Experiment
Homophones
Word Repetition
Neuroscience
Audience Design
Inner Speech

Keywords

  • auditory feedback
  • feedforward processes
  • language production
  • Repetition reduction
  • speech

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Masking auditory feedback does not eliminate repetition reduction. / Jacobs, Cassandra L.; Loucks, Torrey M.; Watson, Duane G.; Dell, Gary S.

In: Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c2da82296bd243f0a0bc3ed7f28074c8,
title = "Masking auditory feedback does not eliminate repetition reduction",
abstract = "Repetition reduces word duration. Explanations of this process have appealed to audience design, internal production mechanisms, and combinations thereof [e.g. Kahn, J. M., & Arnold, J. E. (2015). Articulatory and lexical repetition effects on durational reduction: Speaker experience vs. common ground. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 103–119]. Jacobs, Yiu, Watson, and Dell [2015. Why are repeated words produced with reduced durations? Evidence from inner speech and homophone production. Journal of Memory and Language, 84, 37–48] proposed the auditory feedback hypothesis, which states that speakers must hear a word, produced either by themselves or another speaker, in order for duration reduction on a subsequent production. We conducted a strong test of the auditory feedback hypothesis in two experiments, in which we used masked auditory feedback and whispering to prevent speakers from hearing themselves fully. Both experiments showed that despite limiting the sources of normal auditory feedback, repetition reduction was observed to equal extents in masked and unmasked conditions, suggesting that repetition reduction may be supported by multiple sources, such as somatosensory feedback and feedforward signals, depending on their availability.",
keywords = "auditory feedback, feedforward processes, language production, Repetition reduction, speech",
author = "Jacobs, {Cassandra L.} and Loucks, {Torrey M.} and Watson, {Duane G.} and Dell, {Gary S.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/23273798.2019.1693051",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Language, Cognition and Neuroscience",
issn = "2327-3798",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Masking auditory feedback does not eliminate repetition reduction

AU - Jacobs, Cassandra L.

AU - Loucks, Torrey M.

AU - Watson, Duane G.

AU - Dell, Gary S.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Repetition reduces word duration. Explanations of this process have appealed to audience design, internal production mechanisms, and combinations thereof [e.g. Kahn, J. M., & Arnold, J. E. (2015). Articulatory and lexical repetition effects on durational reduction: Speaker experience vs. common ground. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 103–119]. Jacobs, Yiu, Watson, and Dell [2015. Why are repeated words produced with reduced durations? Evidence from inner speech and homophone production. Journal of Memory and Language, 84, 37–48] proposed the auditory feedback hypothesis, which states that speakers must hear a word, produced either by themselves or another speaker, in order for duration reduction on a subsequent production. We conducted a strong test of the auditory feedback hypothesis in two experiments, in which we used masked auditory feedback and whispering to prevent speakers from hearing themselves fully. Both experiments showed that despite limiting the sources of normal auditory feedback, repetition reduction was observed to equal extents in masked and unmasked conditions, suggesting that repetition reduction may be supported by multiple sources, such as somatosensory feedback and feedforward signals, depending on their availability.

AB - Repetition reduces word duration. Explanations of this process have appealed to audience design, internal production mechanisms, and combinations thereof [e.g. Kahn, J. M., & Arnold, J. E. (2015). Articulatory and lexical repetition effects on durational reduction: Speaker experience vs. common ground. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 103–119]. Jacobs, Yiu, Watson, and Dell [2015. Why are repeated words produced with reduced durations? Evidence from inner speech and homophone production. Journal of Memory and Language, 84, 37–48] proposed the auditory feedback hypothesis, which states that speakers must hear a word, produced either by themselves or another speaker, in order for duration reduction on a subsequent production. We conducted a strong test of the auditory feedback hypothesis in two experiments, in which we used masked auditory feedback and whispering to prevent speakers from hearing themselves fully. Both experiments showed that despite limiting the sources of normal auditory feedback, repetition reduction was observed to equal extents in masked and unmasked conditions, suggesting that repetition reduction may be supported by multiple sources, such as somatosensory feedback and feedforward signals, depending on their availability.

KW - auditory feedback

KW - feedforward processes

KW - language production

KW - Repetition reduction

KW - speech

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075454728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075454728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/23273798.2019.1693051

DO - 10.1080/23273798.2019.1693051

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85075454728

JO - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

JF - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

SN - 2327-3798

ER -