Mapping the mind: bridge laws and the psycho-neural interface

Marco J. Nathan, Guillermo Del Pinal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Recent advancements in the brain sciences have enabled researchers to determine, with increasing accuracy, patterns and locations of neural activation associated with various psychological functions. These techniques have revived a longstanding debate regarding the relation between the mind and the brain: while many authors claim that neuroscientific data can be employed to advance theories of higher cognition, others defend the so-called ‘autonomy’ of psychology. Settling this significant issue requires understanding the nature of the bridge laws used at the psycho-neural interface. While these laws have been the topic of extensive discussion, such debates have mostly focused on a particular type of link: reductive laws. Reductive laws are problematic: they face notorious philosophical objections and they are too scarce to substantiate current research at the intersection of psychology and neuroscience. The aim of this article is to provide a systematic analysis of a different kind of bridge laws—associative laws—which play a central, albeit overlooked role in scientific practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)637-657
Number of pages21
JournalSynthese
Volume193
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Bridge laws
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Multiple realizability
  • Neuroscience
  • Reductionism
  • Reverse inference

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Social Sciences(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mapping the mind: bridge laws and the psycho-neural interface'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this