Abstract
Recent advancements in the brain sciences have enabled researchers to determine, with increasing accuracy, patterns and locations of neural activation associated with various psychological functions. These techniques have revived a longstanding debate regarding the relation between the mind and the brain: while many authors claim that neuroscientific data can be employed to advance theories of higher cognition, others defend the so-called ‘autonomy’ of psychology. Settling this significant issue requires understanding the nature of the bridge laws used at the psycho-neural interface. While these laws have been the topic of extensive discussion, such debates have mostly focused on a particular type of link: reductive laws. Reductive laws are problematic: they face notorious philosophical objections and they are too scarce to substantiate current research at the intersection of psychology and neuroscience. The aim of this article is to provide a systematic analysis of a different kind of bridge laws—associative laws—which play a central, albeit overlooked role in scientific practice.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 637-657 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Synthese |
Volume | 193 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 1 2016 |
Keywords
- Bridge laws
- Cognitive psychology
- Multiple realizability
- Neuroscience
- Reductionism
- Reverse inference
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy
- General Social Sciences