TY - JOUR
T1 - Manufacturing and stiffness constraints for topology optimized periodic structures
AU - Swartz, Kenneth E.
AU - Tortorelli, Daniel A.
AU - White, Daniel A.
AU - James, Kai A.
N1 - This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by LLNL under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. Funding from the Graduate Research Scholar Program and LDRD number 20-ERD-020 through LLNL is gratefully acknowledged. LLNL-JRNL-827808-DRAFT.
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - Topology optimization (TO) is commonly applied to design the unit cells of periodic structures. For example, metamaterials, lattice structures, phononic crystals (PhC), and photonic crystals (PC) have all been previously designed via TO. Unfortunately, the optimal structures for certain design objectives, e.g., bandgaps, are often impossible to manufacture as they have disconnected regions or “islands” of solid material (ISM) that are not self-supporting. Further, designs with enclosed void space (EVS) are problematic for additive manufacturing (AM) since support material or pre-sintered powder cannot be removed after manufacturing. We present a series of constraints that may be incorporated into any TO framework to ensure structures are self-supporting without enclosed voids. Additionally, we employ homogenization-based constraints that allow the designer to tune the elastic stiffness and isotropy of the optimized design. The proposed constraints are evaluated on example microstructures and utilized in a simple optimization test problem to highlight their abilities and limitations so that guidelines for appropriate combinations of constraints may be proposed. Effective constraint combinations are demonstrated on the design of 3D photonic crystals for maximum bandgap subject to manufacturing and stiffness constraints.
AB - Topology optimization (TO) is commonly applied to design the unit cells of periodic structures. For example, metamaterials, lattice structures, phononic crystals (PhC), and photonic crystals (PC) have all been previously designed via TO. Unfortunately, the optimal structures for certain design objectives, e.g., bandgaps, are often impossible to manufacture as they have disconnected regions or “islands” of solid material (ISM) that are not self-supporting. Further, designs with enclosed void space (EVS) are problematic for additive manufacturing (AM) since support material or pre-sintered powder cannot be removed after manufacturing. We present a series of constraints that may be incorporated into any TO framework to ensure structures are self-supporting without enclosed voids. Additionally, we employ homogenization-based constraints that allow the designer to tune the elastic stiffness and isotropy of the optimized design. The proposed constraints are evaluated on example microstructures and utilized in a simple optimization test problem to highlight their abilities and limitations so that guidelines for appropriate combinations of constraints may be proposed. Effective constraint combinations are demonstrated on the design of 3D photonic crystals for maximum bandgap subject to manufacturing and stiffness constraints.
KW - Homogenization
KW - Manufacturing constraints
KW - Metamaterials
KW - Periodic structures
KW - Photonic crystals
KW - Topology optimization
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85127493309
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85127493309&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00158-022-03222-z
DO - 10.1007/s00158-022-03222-z
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85127493309
SN - 1615-147X
VL - 65
JO - Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
JF - Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
IS - 4
M1 - 129
ER -