Magnitude rather than number: More evidence needed

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

Leibovich et al. do not present enough empirical support to overturn decades of work supporting a number sense nor to convince the reader that a magnitude sense provides a better explanation of the literature. Here we highlight what we feel are the main points of weakness and the types of evidence that could be provided to be more convincing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e173
JournalThe Behavioral and brain sciences
Volume40
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Physiology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Magnitude rather than number: More evidence needed'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this