TY - GEN
T1 - Machine Learning Methods for Estimating Propeller Source Noise Spheres
AU - Patterson, Andrew
AU - Hovakimyan, Naira
AU - Pascioni, Kyle A.
AU - Gregory, Irene
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - In this work, several neural network function approximations are compared for interpolating, storing, and sampling acoustic source spheres with applications to propeller noise estimation. These methods are compared using an acoustic model of the three-bladed GL-10 propeller at different flight conditions, with training data generated using NASA’s ANOPP-PAS module. The source spheres used to train the networks capture the tonal propeller noise due to both the blade thickness and loading. This tonal noise prediction method allows the vehicle noise to be estimated for auralization and acoustic control. Three radial basis function neural network architectures are compared in this work. The first two networks directly estimate the parameters of the source sphere at different flight conditions but differ in the number of layers used. The third network estimates the parameters of the source sphere using a weighted combination of spherical basis functions. These networks are trained on numerically generated source spheres, with operating points given in terms of the propeller rotation rate, freestream speed, and propeller angle of attack. The performance of the neural network is determined using a validation dataset of withheld data points. This performance is quantified in terms of the approximation error, training time, and sample time. The third network, which estimates the weights of the spherical basis functions, performs the best in both average and maximum approximation errors in all cases. This network’s worst case performance is 5.6 % relative difference of a model parameter associated with acoustic pressure. The direct estimation network with a single layer has the worst approximation error in all cases. Additionally, the spherically defined network has the slowest sample time at 0.05 seconds per thousand points. Both direct estimation methods produce one thousand sample points in approximately 0.01 seconds.
AB - In this work, several neural network function approximations are compared for interpolating, storing, and sampling acoustic source spheres with applications to propeller noise estimation. These methods are compared using an acoustic model of the three-bladed GL-10 propeller at different flight conditions, with training data generated using NASA’s ANOPP-PAS module. The source spheres used to train the networks capture the tonal propeller noise due to both the blade thickness and loading. This tonal noise prediction method allows the vehicle noise to be estimated for auralization and acoustic control. Three radial basis function neural network architectures are compared in this work. The first two networks directly estimate the parameters of the source sphere at different flight conditions but differ in the number of layers used. The third network estimates the parameters of the source sphere using a weighted combination of spherical basis functions. These networks are trained on numerically generated source spheres, with operating points given in terms of the propeller rotation rate, freestream speed, and propeller angle of attack. The performance of the neural network is determined using a validation dataset of withheld data points. This performance is quantified in terms of the approximation error, training time, and sample time. The third network, which estimates the weights of the spherical basis functions, performs the best in both average and maximum approximation errors in all cases. This network’s worst case performance is 5.6 % relative difference of a model parameter associated with acoustic pressure. The direct estimation network with a single layer has the worst approximation error in all cases. Additionally, the spherically defined network has the slowest sample time at 0.05 seconds per thousand points. Both direct estimation methods produce one thousand sample points in approximately 0.01 seconds.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126772232&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85126772232&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2514/6.2021-2177
DO - 10.2514/6.2021-2177
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85126772232
SN - 9781624106101
T3 - AIAA Aviation and Aeronautics Forum and Exposition, AIAA AVIATION Forum 2021
BT - AIAA Aviation and Aeronautics Forum and Exposition, AIAA AVIATION Forum 2021
PB - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA
T2 - AIAA Aviation and Aeronautics Forum and Exposition, AIAA AVIATION Forum 2021
Y2 - 2 August 2021 through 6 August 2021
ER -