Lyotard on Wittgenstein: The differend, language games, and education

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This essay is concerned with a major theme of work in education influenced by poststructuralism, namely, a hostility toward the ideals of consensus and understanding. Perhaps the foremost critic in education of these aims of communication is Elizabeth Ellsworth (1989, 1997), who argues that these norms express a rational desire to bridge gulfs of culture and experience which, under most educational circumstances, cannot be bridged. The very attempt to do so, Ellsworth argues, disrespects these differences and puts those different from dominant cultures and values at an asymmetrical risk in these situations. She is far from alone in expressing such views; many writers on multiculturalism and feminism have similarly emphasized the insurmountable barriers of difference.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationLyotard
Subtitle of host publicationJust Education
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages36-53
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9781134608416
ISBN (Print)0415215471, 9780415215473
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006

Fingerprint

aim of education
language
multicultural society
feminism
critic
education
writer
communication
Values
experience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Lyotard on Wittgenstein : The differend, language games, and education. / Burbules, Nicholas C.

Lyotard: Just Education. Taylor and Francis, 2006. p. 36-53.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Burbules, Nicholas C. / Lyotard on Wittgenstein : The differend, language games, and education. Lyotard: Just Education. Taylor and Francis, 2006. pp. 36-53
@inbook{ae8e4644e0b74962a4505419b923fc92,
title = "Lyotard on Wittgenstein: The differend, language games, and education",
abstract = "This essay is concerned with a major theme of work in education influenced by poststructuralism, namely, a hostility toward the ideals of consensus and understanding. Perhaps the foremost critic in education of these aims of communication is Elizabeth Ellsworth (1989, 1997), who argues that these norms express a rational desire to bridge gulfs of culture and experience which, under most educational circumstances, cannot be bridged. The very attempt to do so, Ellsworth argues, disrespects these differences and puts those different from dominant cultures and values at an asymmetrical risk in these situations. She is far from alone in expressing such views; many writers on multiculturalism and feminism have similarly emphasized the insurmountable barriers of difference.",
author = "Burbules, {Nicholas C}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9780203187814-7",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0415215471",
pages = "36--53",
booktitle = "Lyotard",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Lyotard on Wittgenstein

T2 - The differend, language games, and education

AU - Burbules, Nicholas C

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - This essay is concerned with a major theme of work in education influenced by poststructuralism, namely, a hostility toward the ideals of consensus and understanding. Perhaps the foremost critic in education of these aims of communication is Elizabeth Ellsworth (1989, 1997), who argues that these norms express a rational desire to bridge gulfs of culture and experience which, under most educational circumstances, cannot be bridged. The very attempt to do so, Ellsworth argues, disrespects these differences and puts those different from dominant cultures and values at an asymmetrical risk in these situations. She is far from alone in expressing such views; many writers on multiculturalism and feminism have similarly emphasized the insurmountable barriers of difference.

AB - This essay is concerned with a major theme of work in education influenced by poststructuralism, namely, a hostility toward the ideals of consensus and understanding. Perhaps the foremost critic in education of these aims of communication is Elizabeth Ellsworth (1989, 1997), who argues that these norms express a rational desire to bridge gulfs of culture and experience which, under most educational circumstances, cannot be bridged. The very attempt to do so, Ellsworth argues, disrespects these differences and puts those different from dominant cultures and values at an asymmetrical risk in these situations. She is far from alone in expressing such views; many writers on multiculturalism and feminism have similarly emphasized the insurmountable barriers of difference.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069569894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069569894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9780203187814-7

DO - 10.4324/9780203187814-7

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85069569894

SN - 0415215471

SN - 9780415215473

SP - 36

EP - 53

BT - Lyotard

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -