Lost and Found in Translation

Popular Neuroscience and the Emerging Neurodisciplines

Jenell M. Johnson, Melissa M. Littlefield

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Recent years have seen an explosion in research by scholars from the social sciences and humanities who apply neuroscience to research in their home disciplines. One way these 'neuroscholars' have engaged in conversations with neuroscience is by incorporating books of popular neuroscience into their work. This chapter explores some of the textual changes that result from the translation of neuroscience to popular neuroscience, and through rhetorical analysis, examines how popular neuroscience is used to support claims in emerging disciplines like neuroeconomics, neuroliterary criticism, neurolaw, and neuroeducation. An examination of scholarship from several disciplines - including sociology - reveals that popular neuroscience is often marshaled not as a translation or accommodation of science, but as science itself via two primary rhetorical strategies we have termed 'fact finding' and 'theory building.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSociological Reflections on the Neurosciences
EditorsMartyn Pickersgill, Ira Van Keulen
PublisherEmerald Group Publishing Ltd.
Pages279-297
Number of pages19
Volume13
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-84855-881-6
ISBN (Print)978-1-84855-880-9
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameAdvances in Medical Sociology
PublisherJAI Press
Volume13
ISSN (Print)1057-6290

Fingerprint

Neurosciences
neurosciences
Sociology
Explosions
Social Sciences
science
Research
accommodation
sociology
conversation
criticism
social science
examination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Johnson, J. M., & Littlefield, M. M. (2011). Lost and Found in Translation: Popular Neuroscience and the Emerging Neurodisciplines. In M. Pickersgill, & I. Van Keulen (Eds.), Sociological Reflections on the Neurosciences (Vol. 13, pp. 279-297). [1959030] (Advances in Medical Sociology; Vol. 13). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1057-6290(2011)0000013016

Lost and Found in Translation : Popular Neuroscience and the Emerging Neurodisciplines. / Johnson, Jenell M.; Littlefield, Melissa M.

Sociological Reflections on the Neurosciences. ed. / Martyn Pickersgill; Ira Van Keulen. Vol. 13 Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., 2011. p. 279-297 1959030 (Advances in Medical Sociology; Vol. 13).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Johnson, JM & Littlefield, MM 2011, Lost and Found in Translation: Popular Neuroscience and the Emerging Neurodisciplines. in M Pickersgill & I Van Keulen (eds), Sociological Reflections on the Neurosciences. vol. 13, 1959030, Advances in Medical Sociology, vol. 13, Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., pp. 279-297. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1057-6290(2011)0000013016
Johnson JM, Littlefield MM. Lost and Found in Translation: Popular Neuroscience and the Emerging Neurodisciplines. In Pickersgill M, Van Keulen I, editors, Sociological Reflections on the Neurosciences. Vol. 13. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. 2011. p. 279-297. 1959030. (Advances in Medical Sociology). https://doi.org/10.1108/S1057-6290(2011)0000013016
Johnson, Jenell M. ; Littlefield, Melissa M. / Lost and Found in Translation : Popular Neuroscience and the Emerging Neurodisciplines. Sociological Reflections on the Neurosciences. editor / Martyn Pickersgill ; Ira Van Keulen. Vol. 13 Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., 2011. pp. 279-297 (Advances in Medical Sociology).
@inbook{d97658ab9ee4435985f8e9c29ad224ae,
title = "Lost and Found in Translation: Popular Neuroscience and the Emerging Neurodisciplines",
abstract = "Recent years have seen an explosion in research by scholars from the social sciences and humanities who apply neuroscience to research in their home disciplines. One way these 'neuroscholars' have engaged in conversations with neuroscience is by incorporating books of popular neuroscience into their work. This chapter explores some of the textual changes that result from the translation of neuroscience to popular neuroscience, and through rhetorical analysis, examines how popular neuroscience is used to support claims in emerging disciplines like neuroeconomics, neuroliterary criticism, neurolaw, and neuroeducation. An examination of scholarship from several disciplines - including sociology - reveals that popular neuroscience is often marshaled not as a translation or accommodation of science, but as science itself via two primary rhetorical strategies we have termed 'fact finding' and 'theory building.",
author = "Johnson, {Jenell M.} and Littlefield, {Melissa M.}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1108/S1057-6290(2011)0000013016",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "978-1-84855-880-9",
volume = "13",
series = "Advances in Medical Sociology",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
pages = "279--297",
editor = "Martyn Pickersgill and {Van Keulen}, Ira",
booktitle = "Sociological Reflections on the Neurosciences",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Lost and Found in Translation

T2 - Popular Neuroscience and the Emerging Neurodisciplines

AU - Johnson, Jenell M.

AU - Littlefield, Melissa M.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Recent years have seen an explosion in research by scholars from the social sciences and humanities who apply neuroscience to research in their home disciplines. One way these 'neuroscholars' have engaged in conversations with neuroscience is by incorporating books of popular neuroscience into their work. This chapter explores some of the textual changes that result from the translation of neuroscience to popular neuroscience, and through rhetorical analysis, examines how popular neuroscience is used to support claims in emerging disciplines like neuroeconomics, neuroliterary criticism, neurolaw, and neuroeducation. An examination of scholarship from several disciplines - including sociology - reveals that popular neuroscience is often marshaled not as a translation or accommodation of science, but as science itself via two primary rhetorical strategies we have termed 'fact finding' and 'theory building.

AB - Recent years have seen an explosion in research by scholars from the social sciences and humanities who apply neuroscience to research in their home disciplines. One way these 'neuroscholars' have engaged in conversations with neuroscience is by incorporating books of popular neuroscience into their work. This chapter explores some of the textual changes that result from the translation of neuroscience to popular neuroscience, and through rhetorical analysis, examines how popular neuroscience is used to support claims in emerging disciplines like neuroeconomics, neuroliterary criticism, neurolaw, and neuroeducation. An examination of scholarship from several disciplines - including sociology - reveals that popular neuroscience is often marshaled not as a translation or accommodation of science, but as science itself via two primary rhetorical strategies we have termed 'fact finding' and 'theory building.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867922421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867922421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/S1057-6290(2011)0000013016

DO - 10.1108/S1057-6290(2011)0000013016

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-1-84855-880-9

VL - 13

T3 - Advances in Medical Sociology

SP - 279

EP - 297

BT - Sociological Reflections on the Neurosciences

A2 - Pickersgill, Martyn

A2 - Van Keulen, Ira

PB - Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.

ER -