TY - JOUR
T1 - Loss Minimization and Maximum Torque-Per-Ampere Operation for Variable-Pole Induction Machines
AU - Libbos, Elie
AU - Ku, Bonhyun
AU - Agrawal, Shivang
AU - Tungare, Samira
AU - Banerjee, Arijit
AU - Krein, Philip T.
N1 - Manuscript received November 21, 2019; revised February 19, 2020 and April 13, 2020; accepted May 10, 2020. Date of publication May 26, 2020; date of current version September 18, 2020. This work was supported in part by the Grainger Center for Electric Machinery and Electromechanics and the Power Optimization of Electro-Thermal Systems (POETS) NSF Engineering Research Center at the University of Illinois, under Award R2.030.19. (Corresponding author: Elie Libbos.) The authors are with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL 61820 USA (e-mail: [email protected]). Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TTE.2020.2997692 Fig. 1. Torque–speed characteristics for two-, four-, and six-pole configurations of a given IM as obtained from finite-element analysis. The machine is nominally designed for six poles. ωb is the six-pole base speed.
This work was supported in part by the Grainger Center for Electric Machinery and Electromechanics and thePower Optimization of Electro-Thermal Systems (POETS) NSF Engineering Research Center at the University of Illinois, under Award R2.030.19.
PY - 2020/9
Y1 - 2020/9
N2 - High power density, high efficiency, inexpensive drivetrains operating over a wide torque/speed range are critical for traction applications. An induction machine (IM) offers a cost-effective, rugged, and reliable alternative to permanent magnet solutions. Varying the IM's pole count on-the-fly overcomes the finite inverter voltage constraint and extends the machine's speed range. To date, the operating pole count of variable-pole IMs has been determined based on the operating speed irrespective of the torque requirement, utilizing a high pole count at low speeds and a low pole count at high speeds. This article expands the pole-selection strategy of variable-pole IMs to both torque and speed. The pole count is used to improve the machine efficiency and minimize the stator current over the entire operating torque-speed range. An experimental 36-slot toroidally wound IM driven by an 18-leg inverter validates the proposed pole-selection method for variable-pole IMs. Stator current and machine losses are reduced at partial loading conditions by utilizing lower pole counts rather than selecting the pole with the highest rated torque capability. The average loss reduction by 1/3 and torque-per-ampere improvement of $2\times $ are experimentally achieved at partial loading by using the proposed pole-selection method compared to linking the pole count solely to the operating speed.
AB - High power density, high efficiency, inexpensive drivetrains operating over a wide torque/speed range are critical for traction applications. An induction machine (IM) offers a cost-effective, rugged, and reliable alternative to permanent magnet solutions. Varying the IM's pole count on-the-fly overcomes the finite inverter voltage constraint and extends the machine's speed range. To date, the operating pole count of variable-pole IMs has been determined based on the operating speed irrespective of the torque requirement, utilizing a high pole count at low speeds and a low pole count at high speeds. This article expands the pole-selection strategy of variable-pole IMs to both torque and speed. The pole count is used to improve the machine efficiency and minimize the stator current over the entire operating torque-speed range. An experimental 36-slot toroidally wound IM driven by an 18-leg inverter validates the proposed pole-selection method for variable-pole IMs. Stator current and machine losses are reduced at partial loading conditions by utilizing lower pole counts rather than selecting the pole with the highest rated torque capability. The average loss reduction by 1/3 and torque-per-ampere improvement of $2\times $ are experimentally achieved at partial loading by using the proposed pole-selection method compared to linking the pole count solely to the operating speed.
KW - Electric drives
KW - induction machine
KW - loss minimization
KW - maximum torque per ampere
KW - pole changing
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85091754190
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85091754190#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1109/TTE.2020.2997692
DO - 10.1109/TTE.2020.2997692
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85091754190
SN - 2332-7782
VL - 6
SP - 1051
EP - 1064
JO - IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification
JF - IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification
IS - 3
M1 - 9099876
ER -