Long-term crop rotation and tillage effects on soil greenhouse gas emissions and crop production in Illinois, USA

Gevan D. Behnke, Stacy M. Zuber, Cameron M Pittelkow, Emerson D. Nafziger, Maria Bonita Villamil

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Two of the most important agricultural practices aimed at improving soil properties are crop rotations and no-tillage, yet relatively few studies have assessed their long-term impacts on crop yields and soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The objective of this study was to determine the influence of tillage and crop rotation on soil GHG emissions and yields following 15 years of treatment implementation in a long-term cropping systems experiment in Illinois, USA. The experimental design was a split-plot RCBD with crop rotation as the main plot: (continuous corn [Zea mays L.] (CCC), corn-soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] (CS), continuous soybean (SSS), and corn-soybean-wheat [Triticum aestivum L.] (CSW); with each phase of each crop rotation present every year) and tillage as the subplot: chisel tillage (T) and no-tillage (NT). Tillage increased the yields of corn and soybean. Tillage and crop rotation had no effect on methane (CH 4 ) emissions (p = 0.4738 and p = 0.8494 respectively) and only rotation had an effect on cumulative carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) (p = 0.0137). However, their interaction affected cumulative nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions significantly (p = 0.0960); N 2 O emissions from tilled CCC were the greatest at 6.9 kg-N ha −1 -yr −1 ; while emissions from NT CCC (4.0 kg-N ha −1 -yr −1 ) were not different than both T CS or NT CS (3.6 and 3.3 kg-N ha −1− yr −1 , respectively). Utilizing just a CS crop rotation increased corn yields by around 20% while reducing N 2 O emissions by around 35%; soybean yields were 7% greater and N 2 O emissions were not affected. Therefore results from this long-term study indicate that a CS rotation has the ability to increase yields and reduce GHG emissions compared to either CCC or SSS alone, yet moving to a CSW rotation did not further increase yields or reduce N 2 O emissions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)62-70
Number of pages9
JournalAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
Volume261
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

soil gas
crop rotation
greenhouse gas emissions
crop production
tillage
greenhouse gas
no-tillage
soybeans
soybean
zero tillage
soil
corn
maize
effect
nitrous oxide
methane
cropping systems
crop yield
Glycine max
soil properties

Keywords

  • Ammonium
  • Carbon dioxide
  • Corn
  • Crop rotation
  • Greenhouse gas emissions
  • Illinois
  • Methane
  • Midwest
  • Nitrate
  • Nitrous oxide
  • No-till
  • Soybean
  • Tillage
  • Wheat
  • Yields

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Cite this

Long-term crop rotation and tillage effects on soil greenhouse gas emissions and crop production in Illinois, USA. / Behnke, Gevan D.; Zuber, Stacy M.; Pittelkow, Cameron M; Nafziger, Emerson D.; Villamil, Maria Bonita.

In: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, Vol. 261, 01.07.2018, p. 62-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{048450bc9ec146468f387cc508304acb,
title = "Long-term crop rotation and tillage effects on soil greenhouse gas emissions and crop production in Illinois, USA",
abstract = "Two of the most important agricultural practices aimed at improving soil properties are crop rotations and no-tillage, yet relatively few studies have assessed their long-term impacts on crop yields and soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The objective of this study was to determine the influence of tillage and crop rotation on soil GHG emissions and yields following 15 years of treatment implementation in a long-term cropping systems experiment in Illinois, USA. The experimental design was a split-plot RCBD with crop rotation as the main plot: (continuous corn [Zea mays L.] (CCC), corn-soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] (CS), continuous soybean (SSS), and corn-soybean-wheat [Triticum aestivum L.] (CSW); with each phase of each crop rotation present every year) and tillage as the subplot: chisel tillage (T) and no-tillage (NT). Tillage increased the yields of corn and soybean. Tillage and crop rotation had no effect on methane (CH 4 ) emissions (p = 0.4738 and p = 0.8494 respectively) and only rotation had an effect on cumulative carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) (p = 0.0137). However, their interaction affected cumulative nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions significantly (p = 0.0960); N 2 O emissions from tilled CCC were the greatest at 6.9 kg-N ha −1 -yr −1 ; while emissions from NT CCC (4.0 kg-N ha −1 -yr −1 ) were not different than both T CS or NT CS (3.6 and 3.3 kg-N ha −1− yr −1 , respectively). Utilizing just a CS crop rotation increased corn yields by around 20{\%} while reducing N 2 O emissions by around 35{\%}; soybean yields were 7{\%} greater and N 2 O emissions were not affected. Therefore results from this long-term study indicate that a CS rotation has the ability to increase yields and reduce GHG emissions compared to either CCC or SSS alone, yet moving to a CSW rotation did not further increase yields or reduce N 2 O emissions.",
keywords = "Ammonium, Carbon dioxide, Corn, Crop rotation, Greenhouse gas emissions, Illinois, Methane, Midwest, Nitrate, Nitrous oxide, No-till, Soybean, Tillage, Wheat, Yields",
author = "Behnke, {Gevan D.} and Zuber, {Stacy M.} and Pittelkow, {Cameron M} and Nafziger, {Emerson D.} and Villamil, {Maria Bonita}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.agee.2018.03.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "261",
pages = "62--70",
journal = "Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment",
issn = "0167-8809",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Long-term crop rotation and tillage effects on soil greenhouse gas emissions and crop production in Illinois, USA

AU - Behnke, Gevan D.

AU - Zuber, Stacy M.

AU - Pittelkow, Cameron M

AU - Nafziger, Emerson D.

AU - Villamil, Maria Bonita

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Two of the most important agricultural practices aimed at improving soil properties are crop rotations and no-tillage, yet relatively few studies have assessed their long-term impacts on crop yields and soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The objective of this study was to determine the influence of tillage and crop rotation on soil GHG emissions and yields following 15 years of treatment implementation in a long-term cropping systems experiment in Illinois, USA. The experimental design was a split-plot RCBD with crop rotation as the main plot: (continuous corn [Zea mays L.] (CCC), corn-soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] (CS), continuous soybean (SSS), and corn-soybean-wheat [Triticum aestivum L.] (CSW); with each phase of each crop rotation present every year) and tillage as the subplot: chisel tillage (T) and no-tillage (NT). Tillage increased the yields of corn and soybean. Tillage and crop rotation had no effect on methane (CH 4 ) emissions (p = 0.4738 and p = 0.8494 respectively) and only rotation had an effect on cumulative carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) (p = 0.0137). However, their interaction affected cumulative nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions significantly (p = 0.0960); N 2 O emissions from tilled CCC were the greatest at 6.9 kg-N ha −1 -yr −1 ; while emissions from NT CCC (4.0 kg-N ha −1 -yr −1 ) were not different than both T CS or NT CS (3.6 and 3.3 kg-N ha −1− yr −1 , respectively). Utilizing just a CS crop rotation increased corn yields by around 20% while reducing N 2 O emissions by around 35%; soybean yields were 7% greater and N 2 O emissions were not affected. Therefore results from this long-term study indicate that a CS rotation has the ability to increase yields and reduce GHG emissions compared to either CCC or SSS alone, yet moving to a CSW rotation did not further increase yields or reduce N 2 O emissions.

AB - Two of the most important agricultural practices aimed at improving soil properties are crop rotations and no-tillage, yet relatively few studies have assessed their long-term impacts on crop yields and soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The objective of this study was to determine the influence of tillage and crop rotation on soil GHG emissions and yields following 15 years of treatment implementation in a long-term cropping systems experiment in Illinois, USA. The experimental design was a split-plot RCBD with crop rotation as the main plot: (continuous corn [Zea mays L.] (CCC), corn-soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] (CS), continuous soybean (SSS), and corn-soybean-wheat [Triticum aestivum L.] (CSW); with each phase of each crop rotation present every year) and tillage as the subplot: chisel tillage (T) and no-tillage (NT). Tillage increased the yields of corn and soybean. Tillage and crop rotation had no effect on methane (CH 4 ) emissions (p = 0.4738 and p = 0.8494 respectively) and only rotation had an effect on cumulative carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) (p = 0.0137). However, their interaction affected cumulative nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions significantly (p = 0.0960); N 2 O emissions from tilled CCC were the greatest at 6.9 kg-N ha −1 -yr −1 ; while emissions from NT CCC (4.0 kg-N ha −1 -yr −1 ) were not different than both T CS or NT CS (3.6 and 3.3 kg-N ha −1− yr −1 , respectively). Utilizing just a CS crop rotation increased corn yields by around 20% while reducing N 2 O emissions by around 35%; soybean yields were 7% greater and N 2 O emissions were not affected. Therefore results from this long-term study indicate that a CS rotation has the ability to increase yields and reduce GHG emissions compared to either CCC or SSS alone, yet moving to a CSW rotation did not further increase yields or reduce N 2 O emissions.

KW - Ammonium

KW - Carbon dioxide

KW - Corn

KW - Crop rotation

KW - Greenhouse gas emissions

KW - Illinois

KW - Methane

KW - Midwest

KW - Nitrate

KW - Nitrous oxide

KW - No-till

KW - Soybean

KW - Tillage

KW - Wheat

KW - Yields

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044919829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044919829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.agee.2018.03.007

DO - 10.1016/j.agee.2018.03.007

M3 - Article

VL - 261

SP - 62

EP - 70

JO - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

JF - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

SN - 0167-8809

ER -