Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Illinois Experts Home
LOGIN & Help
Home
Profiles
Research units
Research & Scholarship
Datasets
Honors
Press/Media
Activities
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Literalism in Statutory Interpretation: What Is It and What Is Wrong with It?
Bill Watson
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Literalism in Statutory Interpretation: What Is It and What Is Wrong with It?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Statutory Interpretation
100%
Literalism
100%
Supreme Court
33%
Operative
33%
Dissent
33%
What-if
33%
Statute
33%
Philosophy of Language
33%
Majority Opinion
33%
Polysemous Words
33%
Textualist
33%
Arts and Humanities
Majority
100%
Literalism
100%
Linguistics
33%
Supreme Court
33%
Dissent
33%
Philosophy of Language
33%
Social Sciences
Legislation
100%
Courts
100%
Philosophy of Language
100%