TY - JOUR
T1 - Linking Survivor Stories to Forensic Engineering
T2 - How an Interscience Approach Reveals Opportunities for Reducing Tornado Vulnerability in Residential Structures
AU - LaDue, Daphne S.
AU - Roueche, David
AU - Lombardo, Frank
AU - Mayeux, Lara
N1 - Acknowledgments. Thanks to Tim Marshall, with whom the lead author first discussed a project along these lines, Jim LaDue for connecting our engineering team with our social science team, and Erik Rasmussen and the VORTEX-SE program for providing the first opportunity to pilot this idea. Thanks to Erica Kuligowski for suggesting the interview structure we adapted from the NIST study she led in Joplin, Missouri, and thanks to her and Maria Dillard for helpful conversations about talking with survivors of natural disasters while we were preparing our proposal. Thanks are also due to Kim Klockow-McClain and Justin Sharpe for discussions about related work. The authors thank Alex Marmo for help in data collection. The authors also thank several students\u2014Catherine Klop (Auburn University), Riley Johnson (Auburn University), Elizabeth Leslie (OU), and Zachary Wienhoff (University of Illinois)\u2014for their help in curating and organizing the data. This material is based upon work supported by the VORTEX-SE Program within the NOAA Weather Program Office under Grants NA16OAR4320115 and NA19OAR4590212 (OU), NA19OAR4590214 (UIUC), and NA19OAR4590213 (AU). Partial financial support from the Structural Extreme Events Reconnaissance (StEER) network for completing the structural assessments is gratefully acknowledged. Finally, the authors thank the many tornado survivors who graciously participated in this study despite the personal trauma and challenging circumstances. Their positivity and resilience were inspiring.
PY - 2024/8/1
Y1 - 2024/8/1
N2 - When a tornado strikes a permanent or mobile/manufactured home, occupants are at risk of injury and death from blunt force trauma caused by debris-loaded winds and failure of the structure. Mechanisms for these failures have been studied for the past few decades and identified common weaknesses in the structural load path. Also under study in recent decades, much has been learned about how people receive and understand warnings and determine how, when, and if they will shelter in advance. Recent research, for example, shows most people do not shelter until close to impact, after seeing, hearing, or feeling the approaching tornado. To advance beyond these innovations, a new, multidisciplinary approach was fielded in nine southeast U.S. tornadoes between 2019 and 2022. For each tornado, 1) wind engineering assessments documented near-surface wind fields, 2) structural engineering assessments documented the primary wind load path for each structure, and 3) social science interviews captured the survivor’s narrative and asked several follow-up questions to assure key items of interest were addressed in each interview. When possible, the team was multidisciplinary during the interview, enabling survivors to ask questions and better understand their experiences. Most survivors became aware of the approaching tornado with at least a few minutes of lead time, and most were able to reach a place of refuge. Most survivors recalled sensory experiences during the tornado, and about half could describe the direction or temporal sequences of damage. A case study of the Cookeville, Tennessee, tornado of 3 March 2020 illustrates the power of the integrated data assessment.
AB - When a tornado strikes a permanent or mobile/manufactured home, occupants are at risk of injury and death from blunt force trauma caused by debris-loaded winds and failure of the structure. Mechanisms for these failures have been studied for the past few decades and identified common weaknesses in the structural load path. Also under study in recent decades, much has been learned about how people receive and understand warnings and determine how, when, and if they will shelter in advance. Recent research, for example, shows most people do not shelter until close to impact, after seeing, hearing, or feeling the approaching tornado. To advance beyond these innovations, a new, multidisciplinary approach was fielded in nine southeast U.S. tornadoes between 2019 and 2022. For each tornado, 1) wind engineering assessments documented near-surface wind fields, 2) structural engineering assessments documented the primary wind load path for each structure, and 3) social science interviews captured the survivor’s narrative and asked several follow-up questions to assure key items of interest were addressed in each interview. When possible, the team was multidisciplinary during the interview, enabling survivors to ask questions and better understand their experiences. Most survivors became aware of the approaching tornado with at least a few minutes of lead time, and most were able to reach a place of refuge. Most survivors recalled sensory experiences during the tornado, and about half could describe the direction or temporal sequences of damage. A case study of the Cookeville, Tennessee, tornado of 3 March 2020 illustrates the power of the integrated data assessment.
KW - Damage
KW - Decision making
KW - Field experiments
KW - Social Science
KW - Societal impacts
KW - Tornadoes
KW - assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85201955371&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85201955371&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1175/BAMS-D-23-0036.1
DO - 10.1175/BAMS-D-23-0036.1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85201955371
SN - 0003-0007
VL - 105
SP - E1521-E1541
JO - Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
JF - Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
IS - 8
ER -