TY - JOUR
T1 - Light absorption by carbonaceous particles
T2 - An investigative review
AU - Bond, Tami C.
AU - Bergstrom, Robert W.
N1 - Funding Information:
TCB is grateful for the support of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under STAR grant RD-83108501, and of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Earth Observing System under grant NNG04GL91G. She is indebted to Timothy Bates and Patricia Quinn at the NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratories, and Theodore Anderson at the University of Washington, who tolerated episodic diversions into old literature when she should have been doing other work. She appreciates the able assistance of Vedran Coralic at UIUC in gathering references. TCB also acknowledges enlightening discussions with Stephen Warren and Warren Wiscombe regarding the optics of particles suspended in liquid.
Funding Information:
RWB gratefully acknowledges support provided by NASA’s Earth Observing System Interdisciplinary Science (EOS-IDS) Program, by NASA’s Radiation Sciences Program, and by the Aerosol-Climate Interaction Program of NOAA’s Office of Global Programs. He also appreciates the indulgence of his colleagues Peter Pilewskie and Phil Russell.
PY - 2006/1/1
Y1 - 2006/1/1
N2 - The optical properties of the light-absorbing, carbonaceous substance often called "soot," "black carbon," or "carbon black" have been the subject of some debate. These properties are necessary to model how aerosols affect climate, and our review is targeted specifically for that application. We recommend the term light-absorbing carbon to avoid conflict with operationally based definitions. Absorptive properties depend on molecular form, particularly the size of sp2-bonded clusters. Freshly-generated particles should be represented as aggregates, and their absorption is like that of particles small relative to the wavelength. Previous compendia have yielded a wide range of values for both refractive indices and absorption cross section. The absorptive properties of light-absorbing carbon are not as variable as is commonly believed. Our tabulation suggests a mass-normalized absorption cross section of 7.5 ± 1.2 m2/g at 550 nm for uncoated particles. We recommend a narrow range of refractive indices for strongly-absorbing carbon particles, of which the highest is 1.95-0.79i. Our refractive indices are consistent with most measurements reported in the literature, and values used in present-day climate modeling are in error. Realistic refractive indices underpredict measured absorption by about 30% when used with common theories for spherical particles or aggregates. Field programs since about 1970 have measured quantities relevant to light absorption, but have only recently made enough measurements to isolate the light-absorbing carbonaceous component and determine its absorptive properties.
AB - The optical properties of the light-absorbing, carbonaceous substance often called "soot," "black carbon," or "carbon black" have been the subject of some debate. These properties are necessary to model how aerosols affect climate, and our review is targeted specifically for that application. We recommend the term light-absorbing carbon to avoid conflict with operationally based definitions. Absorptive properties depend on molecular form, particularly the size of sp2-bonded clusters. Freshly-generated particles should be represented as aggregates, and their absorption is like that of particles small relative to the wavelength. Previous compendia have yielded a wide range of values for both refractive indices and absorption cross section. The absorptive properties of light-absorbing carbon are not as variable as is commonly believed. Our tabulation suggests a mass-normalized absorption cross section of 7.5 ± 1.2 m2/g at 550 nm for uncoated particles. We recommend a narrow range of refractive indices for strongly-absorbing carbon particles, of which the highest is 1.95-0.79i. Our refractive indices are consistent with most measurements reported in the literature, and values used in present-day climate modeling are in error. Realistic refractive indices underpredict measured absorption by about 30% when used with common theories for spherical particles or aggregates. Field programs since about 1970 have measured quantities relevant to light absorption, but have only recently made enough measurements to isolate the light-absorbing carbonaceous component and determine its absorptive properties.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646400486&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646400486&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02786820500421521
DO - 10.1080/02786820500421521
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:33646400486
VL - 40
SP - 27
EP - 67
JO - Aerosol Science and Technology
JF - Aerosol Science and Technology
SN - 0278-6826
IS - 1
ER -