Abstract
The justifiably famous "Asian disease"experiment (ADE) by Tversky and Kahneman established that choices involving uncertainty can be dependent on framing. Description emphasizing gains induced much higher preference for choices in which outcomes were described as certain rather than probabilistic, as compared to description emphasizing losses. The vignette for the ADE involved disease mitigation, and the COVID pandemic gave it much-enhanced realism and immediacy. An attempt to replicate the ADE during the pandemic, however, failed to produce the original results. Other, contemporaneous replications, by contrast, matched the original, leaving open the question of when such framing effects occur.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Journal | Journal of Experimental Political Science |
Early online date | May 21 2025 |
DOIs | |
State | E-pub ahead of print - May 21 2025 |
Keywords
- Framing
- choice
- gains and losses
- public health
- risk
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science