TY - GEN
T1 - Life Cycle Assessment for Manufacturing of Solid Electrolytes
AU - Liu, Zheng
AU - Lan, Kai Wei
AU - Braun, Paul V.
AU - Li, Yumeng
AU - Perry, Nicola H.
AU - Wang, Pingfeng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - As the trend toward transportation electrification grows, the demand for batteries is increasing significantly. Thus, the development of the next generation of batteries is significant, considering safety, reliability, energy density, and design improvements. Consequently, solid-state batteries have become a promising candidate. Much research has focused on finding the optimal manufacturing process for a specific type of solid electrolyte to improve its performance. However, there is no comprehensive comparison among different solid electrolytes. In this research, the life cycle assessment was applied to evaluate the environmental concerns, which can provide a fair comparison between solid electrolytes. Also, this research adopted the widely used industrial manufacturing method (tape casting) for solid electrolytes. The environmental impacts of the tape casting for six types of solid electrolytes were assessed based on the ReCiPe method using the standardized process and unified equipment. As a result, the manufacturing processes for solid electrolytes without lanthanum have lower environmental impacts than those containing lanthanum. It was found that Li6PS5Cl (LPSCl) and Li1.4Al0.4Ti1.6(PO4)3 (LATP) solid electrolytes are excellent choices to lower the environmental impact thanks to their environmentally friendly chemistry and manufacturing process.
AB - As the trend toward transportation electrification grows, the demand for batteries is increasing significantly. Thus, the development of the next generation of batteries is significant, considering safety, reliability, energy density, and design improvements. Consequently, solid-state batteries have become a promising candidate. Much research has focused on finding the optimal manufacturing process for a specific type of solid electrolyte to improve its performance. However, there is no comprehensive comparison among different solid electrolytes. In this research, the life cycle assessment was applied to evaluate the environmental concerns, which can provide a fair comparison between solid electrolytes. Also, this research adopted the widely used industrial manufacturing method (tape casting) for solid electrolytes. The environmental impacts of the tape casting for six types of solid electrolytes were assessed based on the ReCiPe method using the standardized process and unified equipment. As a result, the manufacturing processes for solid electrolytes without lanthanum have lower environmental impacts than those containing lanthanum. It was found that Li6PS5Cl (LPSCl) and Li1.4Al0.4Ti1.6(PO4)3 (LATP) solid electrolytes are excellent choices to lower the environmental impact thanks to their environmentally friendly chemistry and manufacturing process.
KW - Battery manufacturing
KW - Life cycle assessment
KW - Solid electrolyte
KW - Solid-state battery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85200704488&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85200704488&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ITEC60657.2024.10598866
DO - 10.1109/ITEC60657.2024.10598866
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85200704488
T3 - 2024 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo, ITEC 2024
BT - 2024 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo, ITEC 2024
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2024 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo, ITEC 2024
Y2 - 19 June 2024 through 21 June 2024
ER -