lgtC expression modulates resistance to C4b deposition on an invasive nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae

Derek K. Ho, Sanjay Ram, Kevin L. Nelson, Paul J. Bonthuis, Arnold L. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


We have previously shown that C3 binding to serum-resistant nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) strain R2866 is slower than C3 binding to a serum-sensitive strain. Ab-dependent classical pathway activation is required for complement-dependent killing of NTHi. To further characterize the mechanism(s) of serum resistance of R2866, we compared binding of complement component C4b to R2B66 with a serum-sensitive variant, R3392. We show that C4b binding to R2866 relative to R3392 was delayed, suggesting regulation of the classical pathway of complement. Increased C4b deposition on R3392 was independent of the amount and subclass of Ab binding, suggesting that an impediment to C4b binding existed on R2866. Immunoblotting and mass spectrometry indicated that lipooligosaccharide and outer membrane proteins P2 and P5 were targets for C4b. P2 and P5 sequences and expression levels were similar in both strains. Insertional inactivation of the phase-variable lipooligosaccharide biosynthesis gene lgtC in R2866 augmented C4b deposition to levels seen with R3392 and rendered the bacteria sensitive to serum and whole blood. These results suggest a direct role of lgtC expression in the inhibition of C4b deposition and consequent serum resistance of R2866. Alteration of surface glycans of NTHi may be a critical event in determining the ability of a strain to evade host defenses and cause disseminated infection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1002-1012
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Immunology
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jan 15 2007
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology


Dive into the research topics of 'lgtC expression modulates resistance to C4b deposition on an invasive nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this