TY - JOUR
T1 - Leveraging remotely sensed non-wall-to-wall data for wall-to-wall upscaling in forest inventory
AU - Chen, Fangting
AU - Hou, Zhengyang
AU - Saarela, Svetlana
AU - McRoberts, Ronald E.
AU - Ståhl, Göran
AU - Kangas, Annika
AU - Packalen, Petteri
AU - Li, Bo
AU - Xu, Qing
N1 - This work was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (Grant No. 22BTJ005). Dr. Qing Xu was also supported by the International Center for Bamboo and Rattan (Grant No. 1632020029 and Grant No. 1632021024). We are grateful to the international project, Building Biocarbon and Rural Development in West Africa (BIODEV), and our Finnish colleague, Dr. Janne Heiskanen, for organizing the field campaign in Burkina Faso. Review comments provided by the editor and anonymous reviewers are sincerely acknowledged.
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - Remote sensing (RS) has enhanced forest inventory with model-based inference, that is, a family of statistical procedures rigorously estimates the parameter of a variable of interest (VOI) for a spatial population, e.g., the mean or total of forest carbon for a study area. Upscaling in earth observation, alias to this estimation, aggregates VOI from a finer spatial resolution to a coarser one with reduced uncertainty, serving decision making for natural resource management at larger scales. However, conventional model-based estimation (CMB) confronts a major challenge: it only supports RS wall-to-wall data, meaning that remotely sensed data must be available in panorama and non-wall-to-wall but quality data such as lidar or even cloud-masked satellite imagery are not supported due to incomplete coverage, impeding precise upscaling with cutting-edge instruments or for large scale applications. Consequently, this study aims to develop and demonstrate the use and usefulness of RS non-wall-to-wall data for upscaling with Hierarchical model-based estimation (HMB) which incorporates a two-stage model for bridging RS non– and wall-to-wall data; and for optimizing cost-efficiency, to evaluate the effects of non-wall-to-wall sample size on upscaling precision. Three main conclusions are relevant: (1) the HMB is a variant of the CMB estimator through trading in the uncertainty of the second-stage model to enable estimation using RS non-wall-to-wall data; (2) a quality first-stage model is key to exerting the advantage of HMB relative to the CMB estimator; (3) the variance of the HMB estimator is dominated by the first-stage model variance component, indicating that increasing the sample size in the first-stage is effective for increasing the overall precision. Overall, the HMB estimator balances tradeoffs between cost, efficiency and flexibility when devising a model-based upscaling in earth observation.
AB - Remote sensing (RS) has enhanced forest inventory with model-based inference, that is, a family of statistical procedures rigorously estimates the parameter of a variable of interest (VOI) for a spatial population, e.g., the mean or total of forest carbon for a study area. Upscaling in earth observation, alias to this estimation, aggregates VOI from a finer spatial resolution to a coarser one with reduced uncertainty, serving decision making for natural resource management at larger scales. However, conventional model-based estimation (CMB) confronts a major challenge: it only supports RS wall-to-wall data, meaning that remotely sensed data must be available in panorama and non-wall-to-wall but quality data such as lidar or even cloud-masked satellite imagery are not supported due to incomplete coverage, impeding precise upscaling with cutting-edge instruments or for large scale applications. Consequently, this study aims to develop and demonstrate the use and usefulness of RS non-wall-to-wall data for upscaling with Hierarchical model-based estimation (HMB) which incorporates a two-stage model for bridging RS non– and wall-to-wall data; and for optimizing cost-efficiency, to evaluate the effects of non-wall-to-wall sample size on upscaling precision. Three main conclusions are relevant: (1) the HMB is a variant of the CMB estimator through trading in the uncertainty of the second-stage model to enable estimation using RS non-wall-to-wall data; (2) a quality first-stage model is key to exerting the advantage of HMB relative to the CMB estimator; (3) the variance of the HMB estimator is dominated by the first-stage model variance component, indicating that increasing the sample size in the first-stage is effective for increasing the overall precision. Overall, the HMB estimator balances tradeoffs between cost, efficiency and flexibility when devising a model-based upscaling in earth observation.
KW - Model-based inference
KW - Non-wall-to-wall
KW - Survey sampling
KW - Two-stage modeling
KW - Wall-to-wall
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85153064320&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85153064320&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jag.2023.103314
DO - 10.1016/j.jag.2023.103314
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85153064320
SN - 1569-8432
VL - 119
JO - International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
JF - International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
M1 - 103314
ER -