Lessons learned from the analysis of system failures at petascale: The case of blue waters

This paper provides an analysis of failures and their impact for Blue Waters, the Cray hybrid (CPU/GPU) supercomputer at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. The analysis is based on both manual failure reports and automatically generated event logs collected over 261 days. Results include i) a characterization of the root causes of single-node failures, ii) a direct assessment of the effectiveness of system-level fail over as well as memory, processor, network, GPU accelerator, and file system error resiliency, and iii) an analysis of system-wide outages. The major findings of this study are as follows. Hardware is not the main cause of system downtime. This is notwithstanding the fact that hardware-related failures are 42% of all failures. Failures caused by hardware were responsible for only 23% of the total repair time. These results are partially due to the fact that processor and memory protection mechanisms (x8 and x4 Chip kill, ECC, and parity) are able to handle a sustained rate of errors as high as 250 errors/h while providing a coverage of 99.997% out of a set of more than 1.5 million of analyzed errors. Only 28 multiple-bit errors bypassed the employed protection mechanisms. Software, on the other hand, was the largest contributor to the node repair hours (53%), despite being the cause of only 20% of the total number of failures. A total of 29 out of 39 system-wide outages involved the Lustre file system with 42% of them caused by the inadequacy of the automated fail over procedures.