Les pratiques d'évaluation des ONG internationales des États-Unis

Translated title of the contribution: The evaluation practices of US international NGOs

Jiyoung Kang, Steven G. Anderson, Dan Finnegan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Despite the growing interest in performance measurement and evaluation of international NGOs (INGOs), little is known about actual INGO evaluation practices. The present article, based on a survey of 38 US INGOs, examines the process of evaluation practice, as well as the purposes and dissemination of the results. The findings on evaluation purpose, dissemination of results, and formal feedback mechanisms suggest that INGOs typically develop stronger formal accountability measures for donors and staff-members than for beneficiaries. The findings also indicate that many INGOs consider evaluation as an opportunity for organisational learning and for improving their performance. Many of the difficulties identified by respondents in conducting evaluations are consistent with previous literature.

Translated title of the contributionThe evaluation practices of US international NGOs
Original languageFrench
Pages (from-to)317-333
Number of pages17
JournalDevelopment in Practice
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2012

Keywords

  • Aid
  • Methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Development

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The evaluation practices of US international NGOs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this