Legislative Coalitions and Presidential Signing Statements

Katherine Francis, Tracy Sulkin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We examine how the congressional coalition in favor of a law affects the probability of the president appending a positive or negative signing statement to it. Our results show that coalitions matter-presidents consider the power and status of a law's sponsor and the composition of its cosponsorship coalition when deciding whether to offer praise or raise concerns. Moreover, the factors driving praise and criticism differ from one another in important ways. These analyses demonstrate the value of assessing the valence of a signing statement rather than just its presence, and of extending the focus of research on signing statements beyond aggregate factors to investigate how the context surrounding a particular law shapes the president's reaction to it.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)230-254
Number of pages25
JournalCongress and the Presidency
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2013

Fingerprint

coalition
president
Law
criticism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Legislative Coalitions and Presidential Signing Statements. / Francis, Katherine; Sulkin, Tracy.

In: Congress and the Presidency, Vol. 40, No. 3, 01.09.2013, p. 230-254.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{08ce5204ae1043e9b11dfb3a7d3b2448,
title = "Legislative Coalitions and Presidential Signing Statements",
abstract = "We examine how the congressional coalition in favor of a law affects the probability of the president appending a positive or negative signing statement to it. Our results show that coalitions matter-presidents consider the power and status of a law's sponsor and the composition of its cosponsorship coalition when deciding whether to offer praise or raise concerns. Moreover, the factors driving praise and criticism differ from one another in important ways. These analyses demonstrate the value of assessing the valence of a signing statement rather than just its presence, and of extending the focus of research on signing statements beyond aggregate factors to investigate how the context surrounding a particular law shapes the president's reaction to it.",
author = "Katherine Francis and Tracy Sulkin",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/07343469.2013.822943",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "230--254",
journal = "Congress and the Presidency",
issn = "0734-3469",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Legislative Coalitions and Presidential Signing Statements

AU - Francis, Katherine

AU - Sulkin, Tracy

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - We examine how the congressional coalition in favor of a law affects the probability of the president appending a positive or negative signing statement to it. Our results show that coalitions matter-presidents consider the power and status of a law's sponsor and the composition of its cosponsorship coalition when deciding whether to offer praise or raise concerns. Moreover, the factors driving praise and criticism differ from one another in important ways. These analyses demonstrate the value of assessing the valence of a signing statement rather than just its presence, and of extending the focus of research on signing statements beyond aggregate factors to investigate how the context surrounding a particular law shapes the president's reaction to it.

AB - We examine how the congressional coalition in favor of a law affects the probability of the president appending a positive or negative signing statement to it. Our results show that coalitions matter-presidents consider the power and status of a law's sponsor and the composition of its cosponsorship coalition when deciding whether to offer praise or raise concerns. Moreover, the factors driving praise and criticism differ from one another in important ways. These analyses demonstrate the value of assessing the valence of a signing statement rather than just its presence, and of extending the focus of research on signing statements beyond aggregate factors to investigate how the context surrounding a particular law shapes the president's reaction to it.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885038132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885038132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07343469.2013.822943

DO - 10.1080/07343469.2013.822943

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84885038132

VL - 40

SP - 230

EP - 254

JO - Congress and the Presidency

JF - Congress and the Presidency

SN - 0734-3469

IS - 3

ER -