TY - JOUR
T1 - Learning user-defined, domain-specific relations
T2 - A situated case study and evaluation in plant science
AU - Lucic, Ana
AU - Blake, Catherine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2015 by Association for Information Science and Technology
PY - 2015/1
Y1 - 2015/1
N2 - Although methods exist to identify well-defined relations, such as is_a or part_of, existing tools rarely support a user who wants to define new, domain-specific relations. We conducted a situated case study in plant science and introduce four new domain-specific relations that are of interest to domain scientists but have not been explored in information science. Results show that precision varies between relations and ranges from 0.73 to 0.91 for the manufacturer location category, 0.89 and 0.93 for the seed donor-bank relation, 0.29 and 0.67 for the seed origin location, and 0.32 and 0.77 for the field experiment location. The manufacturer location category recall varies from 0.91 to 0.94, the seed bank-donor location recall ranges between 0.93 and 1, the seed origin relation from 0.33 to 0.82 while the field experiment location from 0.67 to 0.83 depending on the classifier and using a combination of lexical and syntactic features in the background.
AB - Although methods exist to identify well-defined relations, such as is_a or part_of, existing tools rarely support a user who wants to define new, domain-specific relations. We conducted a situated case study in plant science and introduce four new domain-specific relations that are of interest to domain scientists but have not been explored in information science. Results show that precision varies between relations and ranges from 0.73 to 0.91 for the manufacturer location category, 0.89 and 0.93 for the seed donor-bank relation, 0.29 and 0.67 for the seed origin location, and 0.32 and 0.77 for the field experiment location. The manufacturer location category recall varies from 0.91 to 0.94, the seed bank-donor location recall ranges between 0.93 and 1, the seed origin relation from 0.33 to 0.82 while the field experiment location from 0.67 to 0.83 depending on the classifier and using a combination of lexical and syntactic features in the background.
KW - Semantic relationship extraction and disambiguation
KW - domain-specific relations
KW - exploratory search
KW - text mining
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84987768373&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84987768373&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010033
DO - 10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010033
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84987768373
SN - 2373-9231
VL - 52
SP - 1
EP - 12
JO - Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
JF - Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
IS - 1
ER -