TY - JOUR
T1 - Lattice strain and damage evolution of 9-12%Cr ferritic/martensitic steel during in situ tensile test by X-ray diffraction and small angle scattering
AU - Pan, Xiao
AU - Wu, Xianglin
AU - Mo, Kun
AU - Chen, Xiang
AU - Almer, Jonathan
AU - Ilavsky, Jan
AU - Haeffner, Dean R.
AU - Stubbins, James F.
N1 - Funding Information:
The work was supported by the US Department of Energy Under Grants DE-FC07-051D14665, DE-FG07-02D14337, and (APS) under DE-AC02-06CH11357.
PY - 2010/12/1
Y1 - 2010/12/1
N2 - In situ X-ray diffraction and small angle scattering measurements during tensile tests were performed on 9-12% Cr ferritic/martensitic steels. The lattice strains in both particle and matrix phases, along two principal directions, were directly measured. The load transfer between particle and matrix was calculated based on matrix/particle elastic mismatch, matrix plasticity and interface decohesion. In addition, the void or damage evolution during the test was measured using small angle X-ray scattering. By combining stress and void evolution during deformation, the critical interfacial strength for void nucleation was determined, and compared with pre-existing void nucleation criteria. These comparisons show that models overestimate the measured critical strength, and require a larger particle size than measured to match the X-ray observations.
AB - In situ X-ray diffraction and small angle scattering measurements during tensile tests were performed on 9-12% Cr ferritic/martensitic steels. The lattice strains in both particle and matrix phases, along two principal directions, were directly measured. The load transfer between particle and matrix was calculated based on matrix/particle elastic mismatch, matrix plasticity and interface decohesion. In addition, the void or damage evolution during the test was measured using small angle X-ray scattering. By combining stress and void evolution during deformation, the critical interfacial strength for void nucleation was determined, and compared with pre-existing void nucleation criteria. These comparisons show that models overestimate the measured critical strength, and require a larger particle size than measured to match the X-ray observations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78349313360&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78349313360&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.07.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.07.003
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:78349313360
SN - 0022-3115
VL - 407
SP - 10
EP - 15
JO - Journal of Nuclear Materials
JF - Journal of Nuclear Materials
IS - 1
ER -