TY - JOUR
T1 - Latent Class Analysis of the CBCL Dysregulation Profile for 6- to 16-Year-Olds in 29 Societies
AU - International ASEBA Consortium
AU - Rescorla, Leslie A.
AU - Jordan, Phoebe
AU - Zhang, Susu
AU - Baelen-King, Grace
AU - Althoff, Robert R.
AU - Ivanova, Masha Y.
N1 - Funding Information:
Members of the ASEBA International Consortium who generously provided data for this paper include: Fredrik Almqvist (Finland), Ivan Begovac (Croatia), Niels Bilenberg (Denmark), Hector Bird (Puerto Rico), Myriam Chahed (Tunisia), Manfred Dopfner (Germany), Nese Erol (Turkey), Eric Fombonne (France), Alessandra Frigerio (Italy), Helga Hannesdottir (Iceland), Nohelia Hewitt Ramirez (Colombia), Yasuko Kanbayashi (Japan), Michael Lambert (Jamaica), Bo Larsson (Sweden), Patrick Leung (Hong Kong), Xianchen Liu (China), Asghar Minaei (Iran), Torunn Novik (Norway), Kyung-Ja Oh (South Korea), Rolando Pomalima (Peru), Vlasta Rudan (Croatia), Michael Sawyer (Australia), Mimoza Shahini (Kosovo), Edwiges Silvares (Brazil), Zeynep Simsek (Turkey), Hans-Christoph Steinhausen (Switzerland), Jose Valverde (Peru), Frank Verhulst (The Netherlands), Sheila Weintraup (Finland), John Weisz (Thailand), Christa Winkler Metzke (Switzerland), Tomasz Wolanczyk (Poland), Nelly Zilber (Israel), and Rita Zukauskiene (Lithuania).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Society of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Objective: We used latent class analysis (LCA) to examine the prevalence and characteristics of the Dysregulation Profile (DP) based on data from the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 6–18. The DP comprises elevated scores on the Anxious/Depressed, Attention Problems, and Aggressive Behavior syndromes and thus reflects significant problems in self-regulation of mood, attention, and behavior. Method: We examined CBCL data for 56,666 children ages 6 to 16 in 29 societies, many of which are countries but some of which are not (e.g., Hong Kong, Puerto Rico). The 29 societies varied widely in race/ethnicity, religion, geographic location, political/economic system, and population size. Results: The various statistical indices for good LCA model fit, while not always consistent, supported a DP class in every society. The omnicultural mean probability of assignment to the DP class (mean of the societal means) was 93% (SD = 2.4%). Prevalence of the DP class ranged from 2% to 18% across societies, with an omnicultural mean prevalence of 9%. In every society, the DP class had significantly higher scores than the pooled non-DP classes on all three DP syndromes. The 8-syndrome T score profile for the DP class in many societies featured elevations on all eight CBCL syndromes. Conclusions: Although the same instrument, analytic procedures, and decision rules were used in these 29 samples, model fit, the number of classes, and the prevalence of the DP class varied across societies. High scores on the three DP syndromes often co-occurred with high scores on most other CBCL syndromes.
AB - Objective: We used latent class analysis (LCA) to examine the prevalence and characteristics of the Dysregulation Profile (DP) based on data from the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 6–18. The DP comprises elevated scores on the Anxious/Depressed, Attention Problems, and Aggressive Behavior syndromes and thus reflects significant problems in self-regulation of mood, attention, and behavior. Method: We examined CBCL data for 56,666 children ages 6 to 16 in 29 societies, many of which are countries but some of which are not (e.g., Hong Kong, Puerto Rico). The 29 societies varied widely in race/ethnicity, religion, geographic location, political/economic system, and population size. Results: The various statistical indices for good LCA model fit, while not always consistent, supported a DP class in every society. The omnicultural mean probability of assignment to the DP class (mean of the societal means) was 93% (SD = 2.4%). Prevalence of the DP class ranged from 2% to 18% across societies, with an omnicultural mean prevalence of 9%. In every society, the DP class had significantly higher scores than the pooled non-DP classes on all three DP syndromes. The 8-syndrome T score profile for the DP class in many societies featured elevations on all eight CBCL syndromes. Conclusions: Although the same instrument, analytic procedures, and decision rules were used in these 29 samples, model fit, the number of classes, and the prevalence of the DP class varied across societies. High scores on the three DP syndromes often co-occurred with high scores on most other CBCL syndromes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078598507&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078598507&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15374416.2019.1697929
DO - 10.1080/15374416.2019.1697929
M3 - Article
C2 - 31914322
AN - SCOPUS:85078598507
SN - 1537-4416
VL - 50
SP - 551
EP - 564
JO - Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology
JF - Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology
IS - 5
ER -