TY - JOUR
T1 - Late-time observations of SN 2006gy
T2 - Still going strong
AU - Foley, Ryan J.
AU - Bloom, Joshua S.
AU - Li, Weidong
AU - Filippenko, Alexei V.
AU - Gavazzi, Raphaël
AU - Ghez, Andrea
AU - Konopacky, Quinn
AU - Malkan, Matthew A.
AU - Marshall, Philip J.
AU - Pooley, David
AU - Treu, Tommaso
AU - Woo, Jong Hak
AU - Smith, Nathan
PY - 2008/10/10
Y1 - 2008/10/10
N2 - Owing to its extremely high luminosity and long duration, supernova (SN) 2006gy radiated more energy in visual light than any other known SN. Two hypotheses to explain its high luminosity at early times - that it was powered by shock interaction with circumstellar material (CSM) as implied by its Type IIn spectrum, or that it was fueled by radioactive decay from a large mass of 56Ni synthesized in a pair-instability SN-predicted different late-time properties. Here we present observations of SN 2006gy obtained more than a year after discovery. We were unable to detect it at visual wavelengths, but clear near-infrared (IR) K′ and H-band detections show that it is still at least as luminous as the peak of a normal Type II SN. We also present spectra giving an upper limit to the late-time Ha luminosity of ≲S10 39 erg s-1. Based on the weak late-time Ha, X-ray, and radio emission, combined with the difficulty of explaining the shift to IR wavelengths, we can rule out ongoing CSM interaction as the primary late-time power source of SN 2006gy. Instead, we propose that the evolution of SN 2006gy is consistent with one of two possible scenarios: (1)apairinstability SN plus modest CSM interaction, where the radioactive decay luminosity shifts to the IR because of dust formation; or (2) an IR echo, where radiation emitted during peak luminosity heats a pre-existing dust shell at radii near 1 light year, requiring the progenitor star to have ejected another shell of ∼10 M ⊙ about 1500 yr before the SN.
AB - Owing to its extremely high luminosity and long duration, supernova (SN) 2006gy radiated more energy in visual light than any other known SN. Two hypotheses to explain its high luminosity at early times - that it was powered by shock interaction with circumstellar material (CSM) as implied by its Type IIn spectrum, or that it was fueled by radioactive decay from a large mass of 56Ni synthesized in a pair-instability SN-predicted different late-time properties. Here we present observations of SN 2006gy obtained more than a year after discovery. We were unable to detect it at visual wavelengths, but clear near-infrared (IR) K′ and H-band detections show that it is still at least as luminous as the peak of a normal Type II SN. We also present spectra giving an upper limit to the late-time Ha luminosity of ≲S10 39 erg s-1. Based on the weak late-time Ha, X-ray, and radio emission, combined with the difficulty of explaining the shift to IR wavelengths, we can rule out ongoing CSM interaction as the primary late-time power source of SN 2006gy. Instead, we propose that the evolution of SN 2006gy is consistent with one of two possible scenarios: (1)apairinstability SN plus modest CSM interaction, where the radioactive decay luminosity shifts to the IR because of dust formation; or (2) an IR echo, where radiation emitted during peak luminosity heats a pre-existing dust shell at radii near 1 light year, requiring the progenitor star to have ejected another shell of ∼10 M ⊙ about 1500 yr before the SN.
KW - Circumstellar matter
KW - Stars: evolution
KW - Supernovae: individual (SN 2006gy)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=53849134517&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=53849134517&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/590141
DO - 10.1086/590141
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:53849134517
SN - 0004-637X
VL - 686
SP - 485
EP - 491
JO - Astrophysical Journal
JF - Astrophysical Journal
IS - 1
ER -