Language affiliation and ethnolinguistic identity in Chickasaw language revitalization

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

While the primary focus in language revitalization centers on fluent Speakers, such movements occur in a wider community of partial speakers, language learners, and non-speakers. In this paper, I explore the linguistic and semiotic strategies within the Chickasaw Nation in Oklahoma that establish an ethnolinguistic definition of Chickasaw community membership, focusing on how such strategies are utilized by those who do not hold Speaker status. Specifically, I demonstrate how non-Speakers take up and reinforce ethnolinguistic language ideologies that connect them to the Chickasaw language through discourses of language affiliation via (1) a familial relationship to Speakers; (2) some level of Chickasaw language learning or activism; and/or (3) a familial relationship to the language learners and activists in the second category.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)100-111
Number of pages12
JournalLanguage and Communication
Volume47
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Semiotics
Linguistics
Language
language
Language Revitalization
Ethnolinguistics
Chickasaw
semiotics
Ideologies
community
Learning
linguistics
discourse
Familial

Keywords

  • Chickasaw
  • Ethnolinguistic identity
  • Language revitalization
  • Native American

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Communication
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Language affiliation and ethnolinguistic identity in Chickasaw language revitalization. / Davis, Jennifer L.

In: Language and Communication, Vol. 47, 01.03.2016, p. 100-111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{89e68b156c234bdd8cfdf519c4eefa54,
title = "Language affiliation and ethnolinguistic identity in Chickasaw language revitalization",
abstract = "While the primary focus in language revitalization centers on fluent Speakers, such movements occur in a wider community of partial speakers, language learners, and non-speakers. In this paper, I explore the linguistic and semiotic strategies within the Chickasaw Nation in Oklahoma that establish an ethnolinguistic definition of Chickasaw community membership, focusing on how such strategies are utilized by those who do not hold Speaker status. Specifically, I demonstrate how non-Speakers take up and reinforce ethnolinguistic language ideologies that connect them to the Chickasaw language through discourses of language affiliation via (1) a familial relationship to Speakers; (2) some level of Chickasaw language learning or activism; and/or (3) a familial relationship to the language learners and activists in the second category.",
keywords = "Chickasaw, Ethnolinguistic identity, Language revitalization, Native American",
author = "Davis, {Jennifer L}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.langcom.2015.04.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "100--111",
journal = "Language and Communication",
issn = "0271-5309",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Language affiliation and ethnolinguistic identity in Chickasaw language revitalization

AU - Davis, Jennifer L

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - While the primary focus in language revitalization centers on fluent Speakers, such movements occur in a wider community of partial speakers, language learners, and non-speakers. In this paper, I explore the linguistic and semiotic strategies within the Chickasaw Nation in Oklahoma that establish an ethnolinguistic definition of Chickasaw community membership, focusing on how such strategies are utilized by those who do not hold Speaker status. Specifically, I demonstrate how non-Speakers take up and reinforce ethnolinguistic language ideologies that connect them to the Chickasaw language through discourses of language affiliation via (1) a familial relationship to Speakers; (2) some level of Chickasaw language learning or activism; and/or (3) a familial relationship to the language learners and activists in the second category.

AB - While the primary focus in language revitalization centers on fluent Speakers, such movements occur in a wider community of partial speakers, language learners, and non-speakers. In this paper, I explore the linguistic and semiotic strategies within the Chickasaw Nation in Oklahoma that establish an ethnolinguistic definition of Chickasaw community membership, focusing on how such strategies are utilized by those who do not hold Speaker status. Specifically, I demonstrate how non-Speakers take up and reinforce ethnolinguistic language ideologies that connect them to the Chickasaw language through discourses of language affiliation via (1) a familial relationship to Speakers; (2) some level of Chickasaw language learning or activism; and/or (3) a familial relationship to the language learners and activists in the second category.

KW - Chickasaw

KW - Ethnolinguistic identity

KW - Language revitalization

KW - Native American

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959331483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959331483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.langcom.2015.04.005

DO - 10.1016/j.langcom.2015.04.005

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 100

EP - 111

JO - Language and Communication

T2 - Language and Communication

JF - Language and Communication

SN - 0271-5309

ER -