Laboratory evaluation of surface amendments for controlling greenhouse gas emissions from beef cattle feedlots

Orlando A. Aguilar, Ronaldo Maghirang, Steven L. Trabue, Charles W. Rice, Larry E. Erickson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Pen surface amendments for mitigating emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), such as nitrous oxide (N2O), methane (CH4), and carbon dioxide (CO2), from beef cattle feedlots, were evaluated under controlled laboratory conditions. Amendments were organic residues (i.e., sorghum straw, prairie grass, woodchip), biochar from those organic residues and from beef cattle manure, and activated carbon. Manure samples were collected from several randomly selected pens from two beef cattle feedlots in Kansas and used in the experiments, either as dry (0.10 g · g-1 wet basis water content) or moist (0.35 g · g-1 wet basis). For each amendment, four different treatment levels (i.e., amounts of material) were placed on top of manure samples in glass containers and analyzed for GHG emissions using a photo-acoustic infrared multi-gas analyzer. From measured concentrations, emission rates were determined. For the dry manure conditions, all amendment materials showed significant reduction of N2O and CO2 emissions compared to the control (i.e., no amendment). For the moist manure conditions, none of the amendments showed significant effects on GHG emissions during the first 8 days; at days 10 and 15 after application, however, the biochar materials performed significantly better than the control (i.e., no surface amendment) in reducing N2O and CH4 emissions. No significant difference was observed in GHG emissions when the amendments were placed on top or mixed within the top surface layer of the manure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Beef
Manures
Gas emissions
Greenhouse gases
Straw
Activated carbon
Water content
Containers
Carbon dioxide
Methane
Acoustics
Infrared radiation
Glass
Oxides
Gases

Keywords

  • Biochar
  • Feedlot emission
  • Greenhouse gas control
  • Greenhouse gas emission
  • Organic residue
  • Surface amendment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Energy(all)

Cite this

Laboratory evaluation of surface amendments for controlling greenhouse gas emissions from beef cattle feedlots. / Aguilar, Orlando A.; Maghirang, Ronaldo; Trabue, Steven L.; Rice, Charles W.; Erickson, Larry E.

In: International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 1, 01.12.2013, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2fb1235475a441c1bb3359ed3b4c6b25,
title = "Laboratory evaluation of surface amendments for controlling greenhouse gas emissions from beef cattle feedlots",
abstract = "Pen surface amendments for mitigating emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), such as nitrous oxide (N2O), methane (CH4), and carbon dioxide (CO2), from beef cattle feedlots, were evaluated under controlled laboratory conditions. Amendments were organic residues (i.e., sorghum straw, prairie grass, woodchip), biochar from those organic residues and from beef cattle manure, and activated carbon. Manure samples were collected from several randomly selected pens from two beef cattle feedlots in Kansas and used in the experiments, either as dry (0.10 g · g-1 wet basis water content) or moist (0.35 g · g-1 wet basis). For each amendment, four different treatment levels (i.e., amounts of material) were placed on top of manure samples in glass containers and analyzed for GHG emissions using a photo-acoustic infrared multi-gas analyzer. From measured concentrations, emission rates were determined. For the dry manure conditions, all amendment materials showed significant reduction of N2O and CO2 emissions compared to the control (i.e., no amendment). For the moist manure conditions, none of the amendments showed significant effects on GHG emissions during the first 8 days; at days 10 and 15 after application, however, the biochar materials performed significantly better than the control (i.e., no surface amendment) in reducing N2O and CH4 emissions. No significant difference was observed in GHG emissions when the amendments were placed on top or mixed within the top surface layer of the manure.",
keywords = "Biochar, Feedlot emission, Greenhouse gas control, Greenhouse gas emission, Organic residue, Surface amendment",
author = "Aguilar, {Orlando A.} and Ronaldo Maghirang and Trabue, {Steven L.} and Rice, {Charles W.} and Erickson, {Larry E.}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1186/2251-6832-4-41",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering",
issn = "2008-9163",
publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laboratory evaluation of surface amendments for controlling greenhouse gas emissions from beef cattle feedlots

AU - Aguilar, Orlando A.

AU - Maghirang, Ronaldo

AU - Trabue, Steven L.

AU - Rice, Charles W.

AU - Erickson, Larry E.

PY - 2013/12/1

Y1 - 2013/12/1

N2 - Pen surface amendments for mitigating emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), such as nitrous oxide (N2O), methane (CH4), and carbon dioxide (CO2), from beef cattle feedlots, were evaluated under controlled laboratory conditions. Amendments were organic residues (i.e., sorghum straw, prairie grass, woodchip), biochar from those organic residues and from beef cattle manure, and activated carbon. Manure samples were collected from several randomly selected pens from two beef cattle feedlots in Kansas and used in the experiments, either as dry (0.10 g · g-1 wet basis water content) or moist (0.35 g · g-1 wet basis). For each amendment, four different treatment levels (i.e., amounts of material) were placed on top of manure samples in glass containers and analyzed for GHG emissions using a photo-acoustic infrared multi-gas analyzer. From measured concentrations, emission rates were determined. For the dry manure conditions, all amendment materials showed significant reduction of N2O and CO2 emissions compared to the control (i.e., no amendment). For the moist manure conditions, none of the amendments showed significant effects on GHG emissions during the first 8 days; at days 10 and 15 after application, however, the biochar materials performed significantly better than the control (i.e., no surface amendment) in reducing N2O and CH4 emissions. No significant difference was observed in GHG emissions when the amendments were placed on top or mixed within the top surface layer of the manure.

AB - Pen surface amendments for mitigating emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), such as nitrous oxide (N2O), methane (CH4), and carbon dioxide (CO2), from beef cattle feedlots, were evaluated under controlled laboratory conditions. Amendments were organic residues (i.e., sorghum straw, prairie grass, woodchip), biochar from those organic residues and from beef cattle manure, and activated carbon. Manure samples were collected from several randomly selected pens from two beef cattle feedlots in Kansas and used in the experiments, either as dry (0.10 g · g-1 wet basis water content) or moist (0.35 g · g-1 wet basis). For each amendment, four different treatment levels (i.e., amounts of material) were placed on top of manure samples in glass containers and analyzed for GHG emissions using a photo-acoustic infrared multi-gas analyzer. From measured concentrations, emission rates were determined. For the dry manure conditions, all amendment materials showed significant reduction of N2O and CO2 emissions compared to the control (i.e., no amendment). For the moist manure conditions, none of the amendments showed significant effects on GHG emissions during the first 8 days; at days 10 and 15 after application, however, the biochar materials performed significantly better than the control (i.e., no surface amendment) in reducing N2O and CH4 emissions. No significant difference was observed in GHG emissions when the amendments were placed on top or mixed within the top surface layer of the manure.

KW - Biochar

KW - Feedlot emission

KW - Greenhouse gas control

KW - Greenhouse gas emission

KW - Organic residue

KW - Surface amendment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891412651&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891412651&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/2251-6832-4-41

DO - 10.1186/2251-6832-4-41

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84891412651

VL - 4

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering

JF - International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering

SN - 2008-9163

IS - 1

ER -