Knowledge versus Execution in Dynamic Judgment Tasks

Ann M. Bisantz, Alex Kirlik, Neff Walker, Arthur D. Fisk, Paul Gay, Donita Phipps

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter deals with two features of dynamic, interactive environments that make a standard application of the lens model problematic. The research presented here is one of the many efforts initiated and supported under the Tactical Decision Making Under Stress (TADMUS) program. A laboratory simulation modeled on the naval Combat Information Center (CIC) environment and the task of the Anti-Air Warfare Coordinator (AAWC) is observed in this fieldwork. Applying the lens model to the laboratory simulation in the context of the CIC and the AAWC was complicated by the dynamic nature of the task and environment. The lens model analysis indicated that the differences between high and low performers could be explained in part by the consistency with which participants executed their judgment strategies and in part by task knowledge.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAdaptive Perspectives on Human-Technology Interaction
Subtitle of host publicationMethods and Models for Cognitive Engineering and Human-Computer Interaction
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Electronic)9780199847693
ISBN (Print)9780195374827
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 22 2012

Fingerprint

Lenses
Information Centers
Air
Decision Making
Research
Warfare

Keywords

  • Anti-air warfare coordinator
  • Combat information center
  • Dynamic judgment
  • Execution
  • Knowledge
  • Lens model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Bisantz, A. M., Kirlik, A., Walker, N., Fisk, A. D., Gay, P., & Phipps, D. (2012). Knowledge versus Execution in Dynamic Judgment Tasks. In Adaptive Perspectives on Human-Technology Interaction: Methods and Models for Cognitive Engineering and Human-Computer Interaction Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374827.003.0004

Knowledge versus Execution in Dynamic Judgment Tasks. / Bisantz, Ann M.; Kirlik, Alex; Walker, Neff; Fisk, Arthur D.; Gay, Paul; Phipps, Donita.

Adaptive Perspectives on Human-Technology Interaction: Methods and Models for Cognitive Engineering and Human-Computer Interaction. Oxford University Press, 2012.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Bisantz, AM, Kirlik, A, Walker, N, Fisk, AD, Gay, P & Phipps, D 2012, Knowledge versus Execution in Dynamic Judgment Tasks. in Adaptive Perspectives on Human-Technology Interaction: Methods and Models for Cognitive Engineering and Human-Computer Interaction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374827.003.0004
Bisantz AM, Kirlik A, Walker N, Fisk AD, Gay P, Phipps D. Knowledge versus Execution in Dynamic Judgment Tasks. In Adaptive Perspectives on Human-Technology Interaction: Methods and Models for Cognitive Engineering and Human-Computer Interaction. Oxford University Press. 2012 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374827.003.0004
Bisantz, Ann M. ; Kirlik, Alex ; Walker, Neff ; Fisk, Arthur D. ; Gay, Paul ; Phipps, Donita. / Knowledge versus Execution in Dynamic Judgment Tasks. Adaptive Perspectives on Human-Technology Interaction: Methods and Models for Cognitive Engineering and Human-Computer Interaction. Oxford University Press, 2012.
@inbook{e756d1a4983c4843816b5a9df3b8df5e,
title = "Knowledge versus Execution in Dynamic Judgment Tasks",
abstract = "This chapter deals with two features of dynamic, interactive environments that make a standard application of the lens model problematic. The research presented here is one of the many efforts initiated and supported under the Tactical Decision Making Under Stress (TADMUS) program. A laboratory simulation modeled on the naval Combat Information Center (CIC) environment and the task of the Anti-Air Warfare Coordinator (AAWC) is observed in this fieldwork. Applying the lens model to the laboratory simulation in the context of the CIC and the AAWC was complicated by the dynamic nature of the task and environment. The lens model analysis indicated that the differences between high and low performers could be explained in part by the consistency with which participants executed their judgment strategies and in part by task knowledge.",
keywords = "Anti-air warfare coordinator, Combat information center, Dynamic judgment, Execution, Knowledge, Lens model",
author = "Bisantz, {Ann M.} and Alex Kirlik and Neff Walker and Fisk, {Arthur D.} and Paul Gay and Donita Phipps",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374827.003.0004",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780195374827",
booktitle = "Adaptive Perspectives on Human-Technology Interaction",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "United States",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Knowledge versus Execution in Dynamic Judgment Tasks

AU - Bisantz, Ann M.

AU - Kirlik, Alex

AU - Walker, Neff

AU - Fisk, Arthur D.

AU - Gay, Paul

AU - Phipps, Donita

PY - 2012/3/22

Y1 - 2012/3/22

N2 - This chapter deals with two features of dynamic, interactive environments that make a standard application of the lens model problematic. The research presented here is one of the many efforts initiated and supported under the Tactical Decision Making Under Stress (TADMUS) program. A laboratory simulation modeled on the naval Combat Information Center (CIC) environment and the task of the Anti-Air Warfare Coordinator (AAWC) is observed in this fieldwork. Applying the lens model to the laboratory simulation in the context of the CIC and the AAWC was complicated by the dynamic nature of the task and environment. The lens model analysis indicated that the differences between high and low performers could be explained in part by the consistency with which participants executed their judgment strategies and in part by task knowledge.

AB - This chapter deals with two features of dynamic, interactive environments that make a standard application of the lens model problematic. The research presented here is one of the many efforts initiated and supported under the Tactical Decision Making Under Stress (TADMUS) program. A laboratory simulation modeled on the naval Combat Information Center (CIC) environment and the task of the Anti-Air Warfare Coordinator (AAWC) is observed in this fieldwork. Applying the lens model to the laboratory simulation in the context of the CIC and the AAWC was complicated by the dynamic nature of the task and environment. The lens model analysis indicated that the differences between high and low performers could be explained in part by the consistency with which participants executed their judgment strategies and in part by task knowledge.

KW - Anti-air warfare coordinator

KW - Combat information center

KW - Dynamic judgment

KW - Execution

KW - Knowledge

KW - Lens model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920689513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920689513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374827.003.0004

DO - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374827.003.0004

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84920689513

SN - 9780195374827

BT - Adaptive Perspectives on Human-Technology Interaction

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -