TY - JOUR
T1 - Knowledge of majority scientific agreement on anthropogenic climate change predicts perceived global risk better than perceived personal risk
AU - Kohl, Patrice
AU - Wardropper, Chloe
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the Yahara Water Sustainability and Climate team and funders for their support on this project. Funding was provided by National Science Foundation Water Sustainability and Climate DEB 1038759, National Science Foundation Long Term Ecological Research DEB 0832652, and Integrative Graduate Education and Research Training (IGERT) DGE 1144752. We would also like to note that Patrice Kohl and Chloe Wardropper were affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison when this study was conducted.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Studies examining climate change risk perceptions rarely differentiate between personal and general risk perceptions. Researchers could come to conflicting conclusions about what variables are important in predicting people’s perceptions of risk if they do not differentiate between perceptions of personal and general risk. In this study, we used data from a survey of residents in a Midwestern region of the United States to examine the relationship between two measures of knowledge and perceptions of the risk of climate change at personal and the global (i.e. general) levels. Knowledge of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change significantly predicted perceptions of both types of risks, but was more strongly related to greater risk perceptions at the global level. Knowledge of climate change’s impact on regional flooding predicted greater climate change risk perception, and we did not find a difference in its association with risk perception at the global versus the personal level. Understanding how different types of knowledge influence peoples’ perception of climate change risks can foster a better understanding of related decision-making processes and used to support more strategic public education and communication on climate change. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2022.2028883.
AB - Studies examining climate change risk perceptions rarely differentiate between personal and general risk perceptions. Researchers could come to conflicting conclusions about what variables are important in predicting people’s perceptions of risk if they do not differentiate between perceptions of personal and general risk. In this study, we used data from a survey of residents in a Midwestern region of the United States to examine the relationship between two measures of knowledge and perceptions of the risk of climate change at personal and the global (i.e. general) levels. Knowledge of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change significantly predicted perceptions of both types of risks, but was more strongly related to greater risk perceptions at the global level. Knowledge of climate change’s impact on regional flooding predicted greater climate change risk perception, and we did not find a difference in its association with risk perception at the global versus the personal level. Understanding how different types of knowledge influence peoples’ perception of climate change risks can foster a better understanding of related decision-making processes and used to support more strategic public education and communication on climate change. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2022.2028883.
KW - anthropogenic climate change
KW - comparative optimism
KW - Knowledge
KW - psychological distance
KW - risk perception
KW - scientific consensus
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127850077&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85127850077&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13669877.2022.2028883
DO - 10.1080/13669877.2022.2028883
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85127850077
SN - 1366-9877
VL - 25
SP - 778
EP - 790
JO - Journal of Risk Research
JF - Journal of Risk Research
IS - 6
ER -