Justifying conclusions in naturalistic evaluations. A practical perspective

Jennifer C. Greene

doi:10.1016/0149-7189(87)90004-8

Justifying conclusions in naturalistic evaluations. A practical perspective

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Naturalistic approaches to program evaluation generate multiple interpretations and possible conclusions, but lack inherent guidance on how to choose among or reconcile them. A practical frame of reference for addressing this challenge emphasizes criteria of utility and credibility, as well as an evaluation process that is participatory and openly value-pluralistic. This paper discusses the logic of justification underlying such a practical perspective.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	325-333
Number of pages	9
Journal	Evaluation and Program Planning
Volume	10
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(87)90004-8
State	Published - 1987
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Business and International Management
Social Psychology
Geography, Planning and Development
Strategy and Management
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Access to Document

10.1016/0149-7189(87)90004-8

Cite this

@article{9e88c8f00b3f48fd81f6c4ef9cee2414,

title = "Justifying conclusions in naturalistic evaluations. A practical perspective",

abstract = "Naturalistic approaches to program evaluation generate multiple interpretations and possible conclusions, but lack inherent guidance on how to choose among or reconcile them. A practical frame of reference for addressing this challenge emphasizes criteria of utility and credibility, as well as an evaluation process that is participatory and openly value-pluralistic. This paper discusses the logic of justification underlying such a practical perspective.",

author = "Greene, {Jennifer C.}",

year = "1987",

doi = "10.1016/0149-7189(87)90004-8",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "10",

pages = "325--333",

journal = "Evaluation and Program Planning",

issn = "0149-7189",

publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Justifying conclusions in naturalistic evaluations. A practical perspective

AU - Greene, Jennifer C.

PY - 1987

Y1 - 1987

N2 - Naturalistic approaches to program evaluation generate multiple interpretations and possible conclusions, but lack inherent guidance on how to choose among or reconcile them. A practical frame of reference for addressing this challenge emphasizes criteria of utility and credibility, as well as an evaluation process that is participatory and openly value-pluralistic. This paper discusses the logic of justification underlying such a practical perspective.

AB - Naturalistic approaches to program evaluation generate multiple interpretations and possible conclusions, but lack inherent guidance on how to choose among or reconcile them. A practical frame of reference for addressing this challenge emphasizes criteria of utility and credibility, as well as an evaluation process that is participatory and openly value-pluralistic. This paper discusses the logic of justification underlying such a practical perspective.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248623921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248623921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0149-7189(87)90004-8

DO - 10.1016/0149-7189(87)90004-8

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34248623921

VL - 10

SP - 325

EP - 333

JO - Evaluation and Program Planning

JF - Evaluation and Program Planning

SN - 0149-7189

IS - 4

ER -

Justifying conclusions in naturalistic evaluations. A practical perspective

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other links

Fingerprint

Cite this