Justifying conclusions in naturalistic evaluations. A practical perspective

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Naturalistic approaches to program evaluation generate multiple interpretations and possible conclusions, but lack inherent guidance on how to choose among or reconcile them. A practical frame of reference for addressing this challenge emphasizes criteria of utility and credibility, as well as an evaluation process that is participatory and openly value-pluralistic. This paper discusses the logic of justification underlying such a practical perspective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)325-333
Number of pages9
JournalEvaluation and Program Planning
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1987
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Social Psychology
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Strategy and Management
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Justifying conclusions in naturalistic evaluations. A practical perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this