TY - JOUR
T1 - Judging interpretations
T2 - But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation
AU - Schwandt, Thomas A.
AU - Lincoln, Yvonna S.
AU - Guba, Egon G.
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - This chapter situates Guba and Lincoln’s chapter within the broad philosophical debate about the justifiability of interpretations. The emergence of a new paradigm of inquiry (naturalistic) has, unsurprisingly enough, led to a demand for rigorous criteria that meet traditional standards of inquiry. Two sets are suggested, one of which, the “trustworthiness” criteria, parallels conventional criteria, while the second, " authenticity” criteria, is implied directly by new paradigm assumptions.
AB - This chapter situates Guba and Lincoln’s chapter within the broad philosophical debate about the justifiability of interpretations. The emergence of a new paradigm of inquiry (naturalistic) has, unsurprisingly enough, led to a demand for rigorous criteria that meet traditional standards of inquiry. Two sets are suggested, one of which, the “trustworthiness” criteria, parallels conventional criteria, while the second, " authenticity” criteria, is implied directly by new paradigm assumptions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=51249160339&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=51249160339&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ev.223
DO - 10.1002/ev.223
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:51249160339
SN - 1097-6736
VL - 2007
SP - 11
EP - 25
JO - New Directions for Evaluation
JF - New Directions for Evaluation
IS - 114
ER -