Joyce Adapting Shelley: The Social Function of Lyric Form: The social function of lyric form

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Critics have increasingly argued that Joyce used formal tactics to promote political ends. None, however, have provided an in depth analysis of Joyce's thinking about lyric form's social function-thinking which was profoundly influenced by the argument of Shelley's "Defence of Poetry." Joyce was both attracted to and skeptical of that argument. He adapted and revised it throughout his career, first in his 1902 essay on James Clarence Mangan, and then through his depictions of Stephen and other poets in subsequent works. But he also always subjected it to a critique inspired by late-Victorian condemnations of Shelley. When read through the lens of his skeptical engagement with Shelley, the lyrical "fine moments" that conclude his major works revise our understanding of the relationship between his aesthetic practices and politics. Those moments suggest that his art required a sense of its own political potency.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)23-41
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Modern Literature
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • "A Defence of Poetry"
  • James joyce
  • Lyric
  • Percy bysshe shelley
  • Politics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Literature and Literary Theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Joyce Adapting Shelley: The Social Function of Lyric Form: The social function of lyric form'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this