TY - GEN
T1 - Joint learning and inference for grammatical error correction
AU - Rozovskaya, Alla
AU - Roth, Dan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2013 Association for Computational Linguistics.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - State-of-the-art systems for grammatical error correction are based on a collection of independently-trained models for specific errors. Such models ignore linguistic interactions at the sentence level and thus do poorly on mistakes that involve grammatical dependencies among several words. In this paper, we identify linguistic structures with interacting grammatical properties and propose to address such dependencies via joint inference and joint learning. We show that it is possible to identify interactions well enough to facilitate a joint approach and, consequently, that joint methods correct incoherent predictions that independently-trained classifiers tend to produce. Furthermore, because the joint learning model considers interacting phenomena during training, it is able to identify mistakes that require making multiple changes simultaneously and that standard approaches miss. Overall, our model significantly outperforms the Illinois system that placed first in the CoNLL-2013 shared task on grammatical error correction.
AB - State-of-the-art systems for grammatical error correction are based on a collection of independently-trained models for specific errors. Such models ignore linguistic interactions at the sentence level and thus do poorly on mistakes that involve grammatical dependencies among several words. In this paper, we identify linguistic structures with interacting grammatical properties and propose to address such dependencies via joint inference and joint learning. We show that it is possible to identify interactions well enough to facilitate a joint approach and, consequently, that joint methods correct incoherent predictions that independently-trained classifiers tend to produce. Furthermore, because the joint learning model considers interacting phenomena during training, it is able to identify mistakes that require making multiple changes simultaneously and that standard approaches miss. Overall, our model significantly outperforms the Illinois system that placed first in the CoNLL-2013 shared task on grammatical error correction.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906923296&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906923296&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84906923296
T3 - EMNLP 2013 - 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference
SP - 791
EP - 802
BT - EMNLP 2013 - 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference
PB - Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)
T2 - 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2013
Y2 - 18 October 2013 through 21 October 2013
ER -