TY - JOUR
T1 - Joint focal mechanism inversion using downhole and surface monitoring at the decatur, illinois, co2 injection site
AU - Langet, Nadège
AU - Goertz-Allmann, Bettina
AU - Oye, Volker
AU - Bauer, Robert A.
AU - Williams-Stroud, Sherilyn
AU - Dichiarante, Anna Maria
AU - Greenberg, Sallie E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Seismological Society of America.
PY - 2020/10/1
Y1 - 2020/10/1
N2 - The three-year CO2 injection period at the Illinois Basin-Decatur Project site (Decatur, Illinois, United States) produced a number of microseismic events distributed in very distinct spatiotemporal clusters with different orientations. Further characterization of the microseismicity encompasses the determination of the event source mechanisms. Initially, the microseismic monitoring network consisted solely of borehole sensors, but has been extended with surface sensors, thereby significantly improving the data coverage over the focal sphere. This article focuses on 23 events from the northernmost microseismic cluster (about 2 km from the injection point) and takes advantage of both, surface and downhole, recordings. The resulting strike-slip east–west-oriented focal planes are all consistent with the east–west orientation of the cluster in map view. The injection-related increase of pore pressure is far below the formation fracture pressure; however, small stress-field changes associated with the pore-pressure increase may reach as far as to the investigated cluster location. Monte Carlo modeling of the slip reactivation potential within this cluster showed that the observed maximum stress-field orientation of N068° is the optimum orientation for fault reactivation of the east–west-oriented cluster. Our results suggest that the east–west orientation of the investigated cluster is the main reason for its activation, even though the cluster is about 2 km away from the low-pressure injection point.
AB - The three-year CO2 injection period at the Illinois Basin-Decatur Project site (Decatur, Illinois, United States) produced a number of microseismic events distributed in very distinct spatiotemporal clusters with different orientations. Further characterization of the microseismicity encompasses the determination of the event source mechanisms. Initially, the microseismic monitoring network consisted solely of borehole sensors, but has been extended with surface sensors, thereby significantly improving the data coverage over the focal sphere. This article focuses on 23 events from the northernmost microseismic cluster (about 2 km from the injection point) and takes advantage of both, surface and downhole, recordings. The resulting strike-slip east–west-oriented focal planes are all consistent with the east–west orientation of the cluster in map view. The injection-related increase of pore pressure is far below the formation fracture pressure; however, small stress-field changes associated with the pore-pressure increase may reach as far as to the investigated cluster location. Monte Carlo modeling of the slip reactivation potential within this cluster showed that the observed maximum stress-field orientation of N068° is the optimum orientation for fault reactivation of the east–west-oriented cluster. Our results suggest that the east–west orientation of the investigated cluster is the main reason for its activation, even though the cluster is about 2 km away from the low-pressure injection point.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092029837&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092029837&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1785/0120200075
DO - 10.1785/0120200075
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85092029837
SN - 0037-1106
VL - 110
SP - 2168
EP - 2187
JO - Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
JF - Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
IS - 5
ER -