Abstract
The authors hypothesized that thinking about the absence of a positive event from one's life would improve affective states more than thinking about the presence of a positive event but that people would not predict this when making affective forecasts. In Studies 1 and 2, college students wrote about the ways in which a positive event might never have happened and was surprising or how it became part of their life and was unsurprising. As predicted, people in the former condition reported more positive affective states. In Study 3, college student forecasters failed to anticipate this effect. In Study 4, Internet respondents and university staff members who wrote about how they might never have met their romantic partner were more satisfied with their relationship than were those who wrote about how they did meet their partner. The authors discuss the implications of these findings for the literatures on gratitude induction and counterfactual reasoning.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1217-1224 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Journal of personality and social psychology |
Volume | 95 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 2008 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- adaptation
- affective forecasting
- counterfactual reasoning
- gratitude
- positive affect
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science