It takes two to tango: a multidisciplinary bibliometric review across six decades of dyadic service encounter research

Social Sciences

• Emotions 100%
• Bibliometric Review 100%
• Authors 100%
• Bibliology 50%
• Emotional Labor 50%
• Legislation 25%
• Business School 25%
• Services Management 25%
• Service Work 25%
• Service Sector 25%
• Marketing of Service 25%
• Design Methodology 25%

Keyphrases

• Tango 100%
• Service Encounter 100%
• Bibliometric Study 100%
• Research Cluster 25%
• Emotional Labor 16%
• Emotional Regulation 8%
• Citation Analysis 8%
• Design Methodology 8%
• Quality of Service 8%
• Emotion-based 8%
• Valuable Insight 8%
• Management Journals 8%
• Business Schools 8%
• Bibliometric Method 8%
• Service Sector 8%
• Service Management 8%
• Service Practice 8%
• High-quality Research 8%
• Service Work 8%
• Journal Lists 8%
• Sector-specific 8%
• Services Marketing 8%
• Bibliometric Analysis 8%
• Top Journals 8%
• School Newspapers 8%
• Author Bibliographic Coupling Analysis 8%
• Service Theory 8%
• Emotion Labor 8%
• Bibliographic Coupling Analysis 8%
• Author Co-citation Analysis 8%
• Dyadic Encounter 8%

Psychology

• Emotional Labor 100%