TY - JOUR
T1 - It Goes without Saying
T2 - The Effects of Intrinsic Motivational Orientation, Leadership Emphasis of Intrinsic Goals, and Audit Issue Ambiguity on Speaking Up
AU - Kadous, Kathryn
AU - Proell, Chad A.
AU - Rich, Jay
AU - Zhou, Yuepin
N1 - * Accepted by Jeffrey Cohen. We thank Jeffrey Cohen, two anonymous reviewers, Musaib Ashraf, Allen Blay, Nicole Cade, Willie Choi, Shana Clor-Proell, Ryan Guggenmos, Vicky Hoffman, Bright Hong, Yoon Ju Kang, Tamara Lambert, Don Moser, Derek Oler, Dave Piercey, Kristina Rennekamp, and Steve Salterio, as well as workshop participants at the University of Arizona, Florida State University, Lehigh University, Louisiana State University, University of Massachusetts, University of Pittsburg, Texas Tech University, and the 2017 International Symposium on Auditing Research for insight-ful comments and helpful suggestions on prior drafts. We thank the Goizueta Business School (Emory University), Illi-nois State University, and the M.J. Neeley School of Business (TCU) for financial support. Previous versions of this paper were titled “Upward Communication of Audit Issues: The Effects of Intrinsic Motivation, Leader Focus, and Issue Ambiguity on Speaking Up” and “Upward Communication of Audit Issues: The Effects of Issue Ambiguity and Intrinsic Motivation.” Data Availability: Contact the authors. † Corresponding author.
PY - 2019/12/1
Y1 - 2019/12/1
N2 - Regulation requires auditors to raise significant audit issues and concerns to the attention of audit engagement leadership and requires leadership to encourage such communication. This research demonstrates, using an experiment and a survey, that audit team members' willingness to speak up about such issues is associated with their intrinsic motivational orientation. Based on this result, we test whether audit leadership can leverage this relationship to increase speaking up, particularly when audit issues are more ambiguous, by emphasizing intrinsic goals. Results across three additional experiments indicate that auditors whose leaders emphasize intrinsic goals, whether directly or through tone at the top and firm culture, are more likely to speak up than are other auditors. We also find that auditors are more likely to speak up when an audit issue is less versus more ambiguous. We conclude that leadership can fulfill their obligation to encourage upward communication by emphasizing intrinsic versus extrinsic goals, regardless of the level of ambiguity surrounding the audit issue.
AB - Regulation requires auditors to raise significant audit issues and concerns to the attention of audit engagement leadership and requires leadership to encourage such communication. This research demonstrates, using an experiment and a survey, that audit team members' willingness to speak up about such issues is associated with their intrinsic motivational orientation. Based on this result, we test whether audit leadership can leverage this relationship to increase speaking up, particularly when audit issues are more ambiguous, by emphasizing intrinsic goals. Results across three additional experiments indicate that auditors whose leaders emphasize intrinsic goals, whether directly or through tone at the top and firm culture, are more likely to speak up than are other auditors. We also find that auditors are more likely to speak up when an audit issue is less versus more ambiguous. We conclude that leadership can fulfill their obligation to encourage upward communication by emphasizing intrinsic versus extrinsic goals, regardless of the level of ambiguity surrounding the audit issue.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85074055585
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85074055585#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1111/1911-3846.12500
DO - 10.1111/1911-3846.12500
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85074055585
SN - 0823-9150
VL - 36
SP - 2113
EP - 2141
JO - Contemporary Accounting Research
JF - Contemporary Accounting Research
IS - 4
ER -