TY - JOUR
T1 - Issues in localization of brain function
T2 - The case of lateralized frontal cortex in cognition, emotion, and psychopathology
AU - Miller, Gregory A.
AU - Crocker, Laura D.
AU - Spielberg, Jeffrey M.
AU - Infantolino, Zachary P.
AU - Heller, Wendy
PY - 2013/1/7
Y1 - 2013/1/7
N2 - The appeal of simple, sweeping portraits of large-scale brain mechanisms relevant to psychological phenomena competes with a rich, complex research base. As a prominent example, two views of frontal brain organization have emphasized dichotomous lateralization as a function of either emotional valence (positive/negative) or approach/avoidance motivation. Compelling findings support each. The literature has struggled to choose between them for three decades, without success. Both views are proving untenable as comprehensive models. Recent evidence indicates that positive valence and approach motivation are associated with different areas in the left hemisphere. Evidence of other frontal lateralizations, involving distinctions among dimensions of depression and anxiety, make a dichotomous view even more problematic. Recent evidence indicates that positive valence and approach motivation are associated with different areas in the left hemisphere. Findings that appear contradictory at the level of frontal lobes as the units of analysis can be accommodated because hHemodynamic and electromagnetic neuroimaging studies suggest considerable functional differentiation, in specialization and activation, of subregions of frontal cortex, including their connectivity to each other and to other regions. Such findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of functional localization that accommodates aspects of multiple theoretical perspectives.
AB - The appeal of simple, sweeping portraits of large-scale brain mechanisms relevant to psychological phenomena competes with a rich, complex research base. As a prominent example, two views of frontal brain organization have emphasized dichotomous lateralization as a function of either emotional valence (positive/negative) or approach/avoidance motivation. Compelling findings support each. The literature has struggled to choose between them for three decades, without success. Both views are proving untenable as comprehensive models. Recent evidence indicates that positive valence and approach motivation are associated with different areas in the left hemisphere. Evidence of other frontal lateralizations, involving distinctions among dimensions of depression and anxiety, make a dichotomous view even more problematic. Recent evidence indicates that positive valence and approach motivation are associated with different areas in the left hemisphere. Findings that appear contradictory at the level of frontal lobes as the units of analysis can be accommodated because hHemodynamic and electromagnetic neuroimaging studies suggest considerable functional differentiation, in specialization and activation, of subregions of frontal cortex, including their connectivity to each other and to other regions. Such findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of functional localization that accommodates aspects of multiple theoretical perspectives.
KW - Emotion
KW - Frontal cortex
KW - Lateralization
KW - Localization
KW - Motivation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872837743&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872837743&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fnint.2013.00002
DO - 10.3389/fnint.2013.00002
M3 - Article
C2 - 23386814
AN - SCOPUS:84872837743
SN - 1662-5145
JO - Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
JF - Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
IS - JAN
ER -