Is There a Special Flashbulb-Memory Mechanism?

Michael McCloskey, Cynthia G. Wible, Neal J. Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Many people report vivid recollections of the circumstances in which they learned of major events, such as the assassination of President Kennedy, or the assassination attempt on President Reagan. Brown and Kulik (1977) argued that this phenomenon, which they labeled flashbulb memory, implies the existence of a special memory mechanism that creates a detailed, permanent record of the individual's experience when triggered by an event exceeding criterial levels of surprise and consequentiality. In this article we evaluate the special-mechanism hypothesis, arguing on empirical and logical grounds that the flashbulb-memory phenomenon does not motivate the postulation of a special flashbulb-memory mechanism. We suggest instead that flashbulb memories should be viewed as products of "ordinary" memory mechanisms, and hence as phenomena that may offer insights into the nature of these mechanisms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)171-181
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume117
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1988

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Developmental Neuroscience

Cite this

Is There a Special Flashbulb-Memory Mechanism? / McCloskey, Michael; Wible, Cynthia G.; Cohen, Neal J.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 117, No. 2, 06.1988, p. 171-181.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McCloskey, Michael ; Wible, Cynthia G. ; Cohen, Neal J. / Is There a Special Flashbulb-Memory Mechanism?. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1988 ; Vol. 117, No. 2. pp. 171-181.
@article{0686125a242847609892dfe2a70c29e3,
title = "Is There a Special Flashbulb-Memory Mechanism?",
abstract = "Many people report vivid recollections of the circumstances in which they learned of major events, such as the assassination of President Kennedy, or the assassination attempt on President Reagan. Brown and Kulik (1977) argued that this phenomenon, which they labeled flashbulb memory, implies the existence of a special memory mechanism that creates a detailed, permanent record of the individual's experience when triggered by an event exceeding criterial levels of surprise and consequentiality. In this article we evaluate the special-mechanism hypothesis, arguing on empirical and logical grounds that the flashbulb-memory phenomenon does not motivate the postulation of a special flashbulb-memory mechanism. We suggest instead that flashbulb memories should be viewed as products of {"}ordinary{"} memory mechanisms, and hence as phenomena that may offer insights into the nature of these mechanisms.",
author = "Michael McCloskey and Wible, {Cynthia G.} and Cohen, {Neal J.}",
year = "1988",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1037/0096-3445.117.2.171",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "117",
pages = "171--181",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: General",
issn = "0096-3445",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is There a Special Flashbulb-Memory Mechanism?

AU - McCloskey, Michael

AU - Wible, Cynthia G.

AU - Cohen, Neal J.

PY - 1988/6

Y1 - 1988/6

N2 - Many people report vivid recollections of the circumstances in which they learned of major events, such as the assassination of President Kennedy, or the assassination attempt on President Reagan. Brown and Kulik (1977) argued that this phenomenon, which they labeled flashbulb memory, implies the existence of a special memory mechanism that creates a detailed, permanent record of the individual's experience when triggered by an event exceeding criterial levels of surprise and consequentiality. In this article we evaluate the special-mechanism hypothesis, arguing on empirical and logical grounds that the flashbulb-memory phenomenon does not motivate the postulation of a special flashbulb-memory mechanism. We suggest instead that flashbulb memories should be viewed as products of "ordinary" memory mechanisms, and hence as phenomena that may offer insights into the nature of these mechanisms.

AB - Many people report vivid recollections of the circumstances in which they learned of major events, such as the assassination of President Kennedy, or the assassination attempt on President Reagan. Brown and Kulik (1977) argued that this phenomenon, which they labeled flashbulb memory, implies the existence of a special memory mechanism that creates a detailed, permanent record of the individual's experience when triggered by an event exceeding criterial levels of surprise and consequentiality. In this article we evaluate the special-mechanism hypothesis, arguing on empirical and logical grounds that the flashbulb-memory phenomenon does not motivate the postulation of a special flashbulb-memory mechanism. We suggest instead that flashbulb memories should be viewed as products of "ordinary" memory mechanisms, and hence as phenomena that may offer insights into the nature of these mechanisms.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0344852833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0344852833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0096-3445.117.2.171

DO - 10.1037/0096-3445.117.2.171

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0344852833

VL - 117

SP - 171

EP - 181

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

SN - 0096-3445

IS - 2

ER -