Is liquidity provision informative? Evidence from agricultural futures markets

Richie R. Ma, Teresa Serra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Electronic commodity trading witnesses a massive volume of order messages every trading day, but little is known about their informativeness. We examine limit order dynamics and their role in price discovery in the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) corn, soybean, and wheat futures markets from January 2019 to June 2020, using order-level data. Between 75% and 79% of the large number of limit orders submitted are then deleted, which contrasts with the much smaller proportion getting executed or revised. Aggressive trades and limit orders substantially contribute to price discovery, whereas nonaggressive trades and limit orders, representing most market events, play a minor role. Following public information releases, there is a shift in trading strategies, with trades contributing more to price discovery and aggressive limit orders contributing less, compared to nonrelease days. Our findings suggest that most limit orders in agricultural futures markets continue to play the traditional role of uninformed liquidity provision.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics
DOIs
StateE-pub ahead of print - May 26 2024

Keywords

  • futures markets
  • limit orders
  • liquidity
  • microstructure
  • price discovery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is liquidity provision informative? Evidence from agricultural futures markets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this