Abstract
Despite the extensive use of industry expectations in measuring forecast accuracy and price reactions to USDA reports, very little is known about their properties beyond the basic statistical characteristics of bias, rationality, efficiency, and relative accuracy. Using unique proprietary data of firm-level expectations for upcoming USDA corn and soybean production estimates, we demonstrate that these forecasts exhibit cognitive biases such as attribution and anchoring. Prior success leads to overconfidence and bolder forecasts, and firms base their forecasts on a known reference value. We also show that the bolder the forecasts, the lesser the accuracy, indicating that substantially deviating from the herd does not pay off when it comes to crop production forecasts.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Journal | Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom) |
Early online date | Apr 9 2025 |
DOIs | |
State | E-pub ahead of print - Apr 9 2025 |
Keywords
- accuracy
- anchoring
- attribution
- behavioral bias
- boldness
- cognitive bias
- herding
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Agronomy and Crop Science
- Economics and Econometrics