TY - JOUR
T1 - Investment in the Common Good
T2 - Free Rider Effect and the Stability of Mixed Strategy Equilibria
AU - Kim, Youngsoo
AU - Kwon, H. Dharma
N1 - Y. Kim gratefully acknowledges the financial support from the ISM department in the Culverhouse College of Business. The authors are grateful to the area editor, the associate editor, and two anonymous referees for their constructive criticism and suggestions that significantly improved the paper. They are also grateful to Xiaowei Chen and Renming Song for helpful discussions and comments.
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - In the game of investment in the common good, the free rider problem can delay the stakeholders’ actions in the form of a mixed strategy equilibrium. However, it has been recently shown that the commonly known form of mixed strategy equilibria of the stochastic war of attrition is destabilized by even the slightest degree of asymmetry between the players. Such extreme instability is contrary to the widely accepted notion that a mixed strategy equilibrium is the hallmark of the war of attrition. Motivated by this quandary, we search for a mixed strategy equilibrium in a stochastic game of investment in the common good. Our results show that, despite asymmetry, a mixed strategy equilibrium exists if the model takes into account the repeated investment opportunities. This class of mixed strategy equilibria disappear only if the asymmetry is sufficiently high. Because the mixed strategy equilibrium is less efficient than pure strategy equilibria, it behooves policy makers to prevent it by promoting a sufficiently high degree of asymmetry between the stakeholders through, for example, asymmetric subsidy.
AB - In the game of investment in the common good, the free rider problem can delay the stakeholders’ actions in the form of a mixed strategy equilibrium. However, it has been recently shown that the commonly known form of mixed strategy equilibria of the stochastic war of attrition is destabilized by even the slightest degree of asymmetry between the players. Such extreme instability is contrary to the widely accepted notion that a mixed strategy equilibrium is the hallmark of the war of attrition. Motivated by this quandary, we search for a mixed strategy equilibrium in a stochastic game of investment in the common good. Our results show that, despite asymmetry, a mixed strategy equilibrium exists if the model takes into account the repeated investment opportunities. This class of mixed strategy equilibria disappear only if the asymmetry is sufficiently high. Because the mixed strategy equilibrium is less efficient than pure strategy equilibria, it behooves policy makers to prevent it by promoting a sufficiently high degree of asymmetry between the stakeholders through, for example, asymmetric subsidy.
KW - free rider problem
KW - impulse control game
KW - investment in the common good
KW - mixed strategy equilibrium
KW - the war of attrition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160294644&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85160294644&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1287/opre.2022.2371
DO - 10.1287/opre.2022.2371
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85160294644
SN - 0030-364X
VL - 72
SP - 684
EP - 698
JO - Operations Research
JF - Operations Research
IS - 2
ER -