Investigation of the limitations to photosynthesis induced by leaf water deficit in field‐grown sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)

R. R. WISE, J. R. FREDERICK, D. M. ALM, D. M. KRAMER, J. D. HESKETH, A. R. CROFTS, Donald Richard Ort

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Abstract. The diurnal cycling of leaf water potential (Ψleaf) in field‐grown sunflower (Helianthus annuus) was used to investigate the cause of water deficitinduced limitation of net photosynthesis. Daily midafternoon decreases in Ψleaf of up to 1.5 MPa and in net photosynthesis of up to 50% were typical for irrigated sunflower during seed filling. These midafternoon values were lowered an additional 0.6 to 0.8 MPa by prolonged drought treatment. There was a nearly linear relationship between the decline in net photosynthesis and reductions in leaf conductance over the course of the day. Thus, it was unexpected to find that the low, midafternoon rates of photosynthesis were associated with the highest intercellular CO2 concentrations. These and other observations suggest that the daily decline in photosynthesis represents a ‘down regulation’ of the biochemical demand for CO2 that is coordinated with the diurnally developing need to conserve water, thus establishing a balanced limitation of photosynthesis involving both stomatal and non‐stomatal factors. There were no indications that either short term (i.e. diurnal declines in Ψleaf) or long term (i.e. drought treatment) water deficits caused any damage or malfunctioning of photosynthesis. Rather, both the daily declines in photosynthesis and the nearly 25% decrease in leaf area induced by prolonged drought appeared to be well‐controlled adaptive responses by field‐grown sunflower plants to limited water availability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)923-931
Number of pages9
JournalPlant, Cell & Environment
Volume13
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1990

Fingerprint

Helianthus
Photosynthesis
Helianthus annuus
photosynthesis
Water
leaves
Droughts
water
drought
leaf conductance
sunflower seed
Water Purification
water treatment
leaf water potential
filling period
Seeds
leaf area
Down-Regulation

Keywords

  • Compositaceae
  • Helianthus annuus L.
  • drought
  • leaf water potential
  • photophosphorylation
  • photosynthesis
  • sunflower

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Investigation of the limitations to photosynthesis induced by leaf water deficit in field‐grown sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). / WISE, R. R.; FREDERICK, J. R.; ALM, D. M.; KRAMER, D. M.; HESKETH, J. D.; CROFTS, A. R.; Ort, Donald Richard.

In: Plant, Cell & Environment, Vol. 13, No. 9, 12.1990, p. 923-931.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

WISE, R. R. ; FREDERICK, J. R. ; ALM, D. M. ; KRAMER, D. M. ; HESKETH, J. D. ; CROFTS, A. R. ; Ort, Donald Richard. / Investigation of the limitations to photosynthesis induced by leaf water deficit in field‐grown sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). In: Plant, Cell & Environment. 1990 ; Vol. 13, No. 9. pp. 923-931.
@article{e65dbce95df94175921088531bde17b5,
title = "Investigation of the limitations to photosynthesis induced by leaf water deficit in field‐grown sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)",
abstract = "Abstract. The diurnal cycling of leaf water potential (Ψleaf) in field‐grown sunflower (Helianthus annuus) was used to investigate the cause of water deficitinduced limitation of net photosynthesis. Daily midafternoon decreases in Ψleaf of up to 1.5 MPa and in net photosynthesis of up to 50{\%} were typical for irrigated sunflower during seed filling. These midafternoon values were lowered an additional 0.6 to 0.8 MPa by prolonged drought treatment. There was a nearly linear relationship between the decline in net photosynthesis and reductions in leaf conductance over the course of the day. Thus, it was unexpected to find that the low, midafternoon rates of photosynthesis were associated with the highest intercellular CO2 concentrations. These and other observations suggest that the daily decline in photosynthesis represents a ‘down regulation’ of the biochemical demand for CO2 that is coordinated with the diurnally developing need to conserve water, thus establishing a balanced limitation of photosynthesis involving both stomatal and non‐stomatal factors. There were no indications that either short term (i.e. diurnal declines in Ψleaf) or long term (i.e. drought treatment) water deficits caused any damage or malfunctioning of photosynthesis. Rather, both the daily declines in photosynthesis and the nearly 25{\%} decrease in leaf area induced by prolonged drought appeared to be well‐controlled adaptive responses by field‐grown sunflower plants to limited water availability.",
keywords = "Compositaceae, Helianthus annuus L., drought, leaf water potential, photophosphorylation, photosynthesis, sunflower",
author = "WISE, {R. R.} and FREDERICK, {J. R.} and ALM, {D. M.} and KRAMER, {D. M.} and HESKETH, {J. D.} and CROFTS, {A. R.} and Ort, {Donald Richard}",
year = "1990",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-3040.1990.tb01982.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "923--931",
journal = "Plant, Cell and Environment",
issn = "0140-7791",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigation of the limitations to photosynthesis induced by leaf water deficit in field‐grown sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)

AU - WISE, R. R.

AU - FREDERICK, J. R.

AU - ALM, D. M.

AU - KRAMER, D. M.

AU - HESKETH, J. D.

AU - CROFTS, A. R.

AU - Ort, Donald Richard

PY - 1990/12

Y1 - 1990/12

N2 - Abstract. The diurnal cycling of leaf water potential (Ψleaf) in field‐grown sunflower (Helianthus annuus) was used to investigate the cause of water deficitinduced limitation of net photosynthesis. Daily midafternoon decreases in Ψleaf of up to 1.5 MPa and in net photosynthesis of up to 50% were typical for irrigated sunflower during seed filling. These midafternoon values were lowered an additional 0.6 to 0.8 MPa by prolonged drought treatment. There was a nearly linear relationship between the decline in net photosynthesis and reductions in leaf conductance over the course of the day. Thus, it was unexpected to find that the low, midafternoon rates of photosynthesis were associated with the highest intercellular CO2 concentrations. These and other observations suggest that the daily decline in photosynthesis represents a ‘down regulation’ of the biochemical demand for CO2 that is coordinated with the diurnally developing need to conserve water, thus establishing a balanced limitation of photosynthesis involving both stomatal and non‐stomatal factors. There were no indications that either short term (i.e. diurnal declines in Ψleaf) or long term (i.e. drought treatment) water deficits caused any damage or malfunctioning of photosynthesis. Rather, both the daily declines in photosynthesis and the nearly 25% decrease in leaf area induced by prolonged drought appeared to be well‐controlled adaptive responses by field‐grown sunflower plants to limited water availability.

AB - Abstract. The diurnal cycling of leaf water potential (Ψleaf) in field‐grown sunflower (Helianthus annuus) was used to investigate the cause of water deficitinduced limitation of net photosynthesis. Daily midafternoon decreases in Ψleaf of up to 1.5 MPa and in net photosynthesis of up to 50% were typical for irrigated sunflower during seed filling. These midafternoon values were lowered an additional 0.6 to 0.8 MPa by prolonged drought treatment. There was a nearly linear relationship between the decline in net photosynthesis and reductions in leaf conductance over the course of the day. Thus, it was unexpected to find that the low, midafternoon rates of photosynthesis were associated with the highest intercellular CO2 concentrations. These and other observations suggest that the daily decline in photosynthesis represents a ‘down regulation’ of the biochemical demand for CO2 that is coordinated with the diurnally developing need to conserve water, thus establishing a balanced limitation of photosynthesis involving both stomatal and non‐stomatal factors. There were no indications that either short term (i.e. diurnal declines in Ψleaf) or long term (i.e. drought treatment) water deficits caused any damage or malfunctioning of photosynthesis. Rather, both the daily declines in photosynthesis and the nearly 25% decrease in leaf area induced by prolonged drought appeared to be well‐controlled adaptive responses by field‐grown sunflower plants to limited water availability.

KW - Compositaceae

KW - Helianthus annuus L.

KW - drought

KW - leaf water potential

KW - photophosphorylation

KW - photosynthesis

KW - sunflower

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84989052325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84989052325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1990.tb01982.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1990.tb01982.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84989052325

VL - 13

SP - 923

EP - 931

JO - Plant, Cell and Environment

JF - Plant, Cell and Environment

SN - 0140-7791

IS - 9

ER -