Investigating whether group status modulates the relationship between individual differences in epistemic motivation and political conservatism

Chadly Stern, Jordan Axt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Previous research has found that individual differences in epistemic motivation predict political conservatism. However, meta-analyses indicate substantial heterogeneity in this association and such variation remains underexamined. Using a large, pre-existing dataset, we investigated whether group status—a group's social value—modulates this relationship. We used several assessments of epistemic motivation (need for structure, need for cognition) and group status (race, gender, social class). We found that the epistemic motivation-ideology relationship was stronger for women (versus men) and for members of lower (versus higher) social class groups, although the relationship strength differences were relatively small. The relationship did not consistently vary across racial group status. Group status appears to be a small, but not consistent, moderator of the epistemic motivation-ideology relationship.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number103940
JournalJournal of Research in Personality
Volume86
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2020

Keywords

  • AIID
  • Epistemic motivation
  • Group status
  • Political ideology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Investigating whether group status modulates the relationship between individual differences in epistemic motivation and political conservatism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this