Introduction

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Why create a new Cambridge History of American Women's Literature? Why is this the time to analyze the breadth and range of scholarship that the last thirty years have inaugurated in American women's literature and to discuss what we have left to do? Because now is the time to move beyond 1980s paradigms and 1990s elaborations to include a wider vision of this literary history. Since 1980, mode after new mode of interpretation has been added to change how American women's writing might be studied, whether through new historicism or affect theory, including models of modern woundedness and “the female complaint.” Much important recovery work has already been done, giving us many authors to read and analyze, but much more remains: too few writers have been explored in their entirety (like Lydia Maria Child or Catharine Sedgwick). More important, as Susan Williams argues, thinking of women's writing as a non-oppositional strategy has helped us to begin to study women's writing, not in resistance to the male canon, but as a new field altogether. We are still discovering ways of historicizing and recombining this literature, rethinking contexts, categories, and juxtapositions. And perhaps most exciting these days is the reading of women transatlantically, hemispherically, or through “deep time,” giving us transnational, global, and comparative ideas about women's writing.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Cambridge History of American Women's Literature
EditorsDale M Bauer
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages1-10
ISBN (Electronic)9780511735912
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Women's Writing
Women's Literature
1990s
Affect Theory
Elaboration
New Historicism
History
Canon
Recovery
Writer
Paradigm
Complaints
1980s
Juxtaposition
Literary History

Cite this

Bauer, D. (2012). Introduction. In D. M. Bauer (Ed.), The Cambridge History of American Women's Literature (pp. 1-10). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9781107001374.002

Introduction. / Bauer, Dale.

The Cambridge History of American Women's Literature. ed. / Dale M Bauer. Cambridge University Press, 2012. p. 1-10.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Bauer, D 2012, Introduction. in DM Bauer (ed.), The Cambridge History of American Women's Literature. Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9781107001374.002
Bauer D. Introduction. In Bauer DM, editor, The Cambridge History of American Women's Literature. Cambridge University Press. 2012. p. 1-10 https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9781107001374.002
Bauer, Dale. / Introduction. The Cambridge History of American Women's Literature. editor / Dale M Bauer. Cambridge University Press, 2012. pp. 1-10
@inbook{006cb5042d004509a93722632856cf5c,
title = "Introduction",
abstract = "Why create a new Cambridge History of American Women's Literature? Why is this the time to analyze the breadth and range of scholarship that the last thirty years have inaugurated in American women's literature and to discuss what we have left to do? Because now is the time to move beyond 1980s paradigms and 1990s elaborations to include a wider vision of this literary history. Since 1980, mode after new mode of interpretation has been added to change how American women's writing might be studied, whether through new historicism or affect theory, including models of modern woundedness and “the female complaint.” Much important recovery work has already been done, giving us many authors to read and analyze, but much more remains: too few writers have been explored in their entirety (like Lydia Maria Child or Catharine Sedgwick). More important, as Susan Williams argues, thinking of women's writing as a non-oppositional strategy has helped us to begin to study women's writing, not in resistance to the male canon, but as a new field altogether. We are still discovering ways of historicizing and recombining this literature, rethinking contexts, categories, and juxtapositions. And perhaps most exciting these days is the reading of women transatlantically, hemispherically, or through “deep time,” giving us transnational, global, and comparative ideas about women's writing.",
author = "Dale Bauer",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1017/CHOL9781107001374.002",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--10",
editor = "Bauer, {Dale M}",
booktitle = "The Cambridge History of American Women's Literature",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Introduction

AU - Bauer, Dale

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Why create a new Cambridge History of American Women's Literature? Why is this the time to analyze the breadth and range of scholarship that the last thirty years have inaugurated in American women's literature and to discuss what we have left to do? Because now is the time to move beyond 1980s paradigms and 1990s elaborations to include a wider vision of this literary history. Since 1980, mode after new mode of interpretation has been added to change how American women's writing might be studied, whether through new historicism or affect theory, including models of modern woundedness and “the female complaint.” Much important recovery work has already been done, giving us many authors to read and analyze, but much more remains: too few writers have been explored in their entirety (like Lydia Maria Child or Catharine Sedgwick). More important, as Susan Williams argues, thinking of women's writing as a non-oppositional strategy has helped us to begin to study women's writing, not in resistance to the male canon, but as a new field altogether. We are still discovering ways of historicizing and recombining this literature, rethinking contexts, categories, and juxtapositions. And perhaps most exciting these days is the reading of women transatlantically, hemispherically, or through “deep time,” giving us transnational, global, and comparative ideas about women's writing.

AB - Why create a new Cambridge History of American Women's Literature? Why is this the time to analyze the breadth and range of scholarship that the last thirty years have inaugurated in American women's literature and to discuss what we have left to do? Because now is the time to move beyond 1980s paradigms and 1990s elaborations to include a wider vision of this literary history. Since 1980, mode after new mode of interpretation has been added to change how American women's writing might be studied, whether through new historicism or affect theory, including models of modern woundedness and “the female complaint.” Much important recovery work has already been done, giving us many authors to read and analyze, but much more remains: too few writers have been explored in their entirety (like Lydia Maria Child or Catharine Sedgwick). More important, as Susan Williams argues, thinking of women's writing as a non-oppositional strategy has helped us to begin to study women's writing, not in resistance to the male canon, but as a new field altogether. We are still discovering ways of historicizing and recombining this literature, rethinking contexts, categories, and juxtapositions. And perhaps most exciting these days is the reading of women transatlantically, hemispherically, or through “deep time,” giving us transnational, global, and comparative ideas about women's writing.

U2 - 10.1017/CHOL9781107001374.002

DO - 10.1017/CHOL9781107001374.002

M3 - Chapter

SP - 1

EP - 10

BT - The Cambridge History of American Women's Literature

A2 - Bauer, Dale M

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -