Introduced Brassica nigra populations exhibit greater growth and herbivore resistance but less tolerance than native populations in the native range

A. M. O. Oduor, Richard A. Lankau, S. Y. Strauss, J. M. Gómez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Rapid post-introduction evolution has been found in many invasive plant species, and includes changes in defence (resistance and tolerance) and competitive ability traits. Here, we explored the post-introduction evolution of a trade-off between resistance to and tolerance of herbivory, which has received little attention. In a common garden experiment in a native range, nine invasive and 16 native populations of Brassica nigra were compared for growth and defence traits. Invasive populations had higher resistance to, but lower tolerance of, herbivore damage than native populations. Invasive populations survived better and produced more seeds than native ones when released from herbivores; but fitness was equivalent between the regions under ambient herbivory. The invasive populations grew taller, and produced more biomass and lighter seeds than natives, irrespective of insecticide treatment. In addition to supporting the idea of post-introduction rapid evolution of plant traits, our results also contribute to an emerging pattern of both increasing resistance and growth in invasive populations, contrary to the predictions of earlier theories of resistance-growth trade-offs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)536-544
Number of pages9
JournalNew Phytologist
Volume191
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2011

Keywords

  • INHS
  • Shifting defence hypothesis
  • Invasive species
  • Tolerance
  • Glucosinolates
  • Brassica nigra
  • Enemy release hypothesis
  • Evolution of increased competitive ability
  • Defence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Plant Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Introduced Brassica nigra populations exhibit greater growth and herbivore resistance but less tolerance than native populations in the native range'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this