TY - JOUR
T1 - Interpreting Behavior Genetic Models
T2 - Seven Developmental Processes to Understand
AU - Briley, Daniel A.
AU - Livengood, Jonathan
AU - Derringer, Jaime
AU - Tucker-Drob, Elliot M.
AU - Fraley, R. Chris
AU - Roberts, Brent W.
N1 - Acknowledgements The production of this manuscript was supported by a Grant from the John Templeton Foundation (JTF58792).
PY - 2019/3/15
Y1 - 2019/3/15
N2 - Behavior genetic findings figure in debates ranging from urgent public policy matters to perennial questions about the nature of human agency. Despite a common set of methodological tools, behavior genetic studies approach scientific questions with potentially divergent goals. Some studies may be interested in identifying a complete model of how individual differences come to be (e.g., identifying causal pathways among genotypes, environments, and phenotypes across development). Other studies place primary importance on developing models with predictive utility, in which case understanding of underlying causal processes is not necessarily required. Although certainly not mutually exclusive, these two goals often represent tradeoffs in terms of costs and benefits associated with various methodological approaches. In particular, given that most empirical behavior genetic research assumes that variance can be neatly decomposed into independent genetic and environmental components, violations of model assumptions have different consequences for interpretation, depending on the particular goals. Developmental behavior genetic theories postulate complex transactions between genetic variation and environmental experiences over time, meaning assumptions are routinely violated.
AB - Behavior genetic findings figure in debates ranging from urgent public policy matters to perennial questions about the nature of human agency. Despite a common set of methodological tools, behavior genetic studies approach scientific questions with potentially divergent goals. Some studies may be interested in identifying a complete model of how individual differences come to be (e.g., identifying causal pathways among genotypes, environments, and phenotypes across development). Other studies place primary importance on developing models with predictive utility, in which case understanding of underlying causal processes is not necessarily required. Although certainly not mutually exclusive, these two goals often represent tradeoffs in terms of costs and benefits associated with various methodological approaches. In particular, given that most empirical behavior genetic research assumes that variance can be neatly decomposed into independent genetic and environmental components, violations of model assumptions have different consequences for interpretation, depending on the particular goals. Developmental behavior genetic theories postulate complex transactions between genetic variation and environmental experiences over time, meaning assumptions are routinely violated.
KW - Cognitive ability
KW - Developmental genetics
KW - Gene–environment interplay
KW - Human agency
KW - Personality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057142198&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057142198&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10519-018-9939-6
DO - 10.1007/s10519-018-9939-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 30467668
AN - SCOPUS:85057142198
SN - 0001-8244
VL - 49
SP - 196
EP - 210
JO - Behavior genetics
JF - Behavior genetics
IS - 2
ER -