TY - GEN
T1 - Interface of the direct analysis method and seismic design
AU - Okazaki, Taichiro
AU - Parkolap, Mathew
AU - Fahnestock, Larry A.
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - The Direct Analysis Method (DM) is a new procedure to address stability requirements in steel framing systems. Because the DM has important benefits over conventional methods, it is expected that the DM will replace the conventional methods as the standard method for stability analysis and design. However, currently, the interface of the DM and seismic design requirements is not well established. Stability is an important design consideration both in the absence of earthquake loads when the system ductility demand at the ultimate strength level is minimal, and in the presence of earthquake loads when the design premise is to permit controlled inelastic deformation in the system and provide large ductility capacity. Nonetheless, previous studies of the DM have not examined in depth how the DM could address seismic effects. Therefore, a study was initiated to investigate the interface of the DM and seismic design requirements, as the first step to expand the application and benefits of the DM to seismic design. The objectives of the study are: (1) to clarify how the DM addresses seismic effects; (2) to evaluate how the DM including plastic analysis, termed "direct elastic-plastic hinge analysis, " addresses seismic effects; and (3) to identify research needs related to the interface of the DM and seismic design requirements. This paper describes a pilot study that partially addressesobjectives (1) and (2).
AB - The Direct Analysis Method (DM) is a new procedure to address stability requirements in steel framing systems. Because the DM has important benefits over conventional methods, it is expected that the DM will replace the conventional methods as the standard method for stability analysis and design. However, currently, the interface of the DM and seismic design requirements is not well established. Stability is an important design consideration both in the absence of earthquake loads when the system ductility demand at the ultimate strength level is minimal, and in the presence of earthquake loads when the design premise is to permit controlled inelastic deformation in the system and provide large ductility capacity. Nonetheless, previous studies of the DM have not examined in depth how the DM could address seismic effects. Therefore, a study was initiated to investigate the interface of the DM and seismic design requirements, as the first step to expand the application and benefits of the DM to seismic design. The objectives of the study are: (1) to clarify how the DM addresses seismic effects; (2) to evaluate how the DM including plastic analysis, termed "direct elastic-plastic hinge analysis, " addresses seismic effects; and (3) to identify research needs related to the interface of the DM and seismic design requirements. This paper describes a pilot study that partially addressesobjectives (1) and (2).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69949123013&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69949123013&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1061/41031(341)68
DO - 10.1061/41031(341)68
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:69949123013
SN - 9780784410318
T3 - Proceedings of the 2009 Structures Congress - Don't Mess with Structural Engineers: Expanding Our Role
SP - 619
EP - 626
BT - Proceedings of the 2009 Structures Congress - Don't Mess with Structural Engineers
T2 - 2009 Structures Congress - Don't Mess with Structural Engineers: Expanding Our Role
Y2 - 30 April 2009 through 2 May 2009
ER -