TY - JOUR
T1 - Intellectual property exhaustion, breeder frustration, and hindered innovation
T2 - Reviewing U.S. organic corn seed development
AU - Endres, A. Bryan
AU - Guarino, Jessica
AU - Nathani, Nabilah
N1 - This work was supported by USDA grant numbers ILLU-470-394 and 2017-51300-27115 and the C. Allen and Darren A. Bock Agricultural Law and Policy Program in the Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois.
Development of the JAFSCD special section in which this article appears, “Fostering Socially and Ecologically Resilient Food and Farm Systems Through Research Networks,” was sponsored by INFAS and eOrganic and supported in part by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, through the Organic Agriculture Research and Education Initiative, Grant # 2017-51300-27115.
PY - 2023/6/1
Y1 - 2023/6/1
N2 - Private-sector dominance of plant breeding consttutes the present norm of organic seed genetics research, which has generated concerns in the organic farming community in this era of robust intellectual property protections. Intellectual property restrictions primarily in the form of certificates, patents, and contractual arrangements are blamed for stifling the innovation of organic seed varieties. To better understand the challenges small-scale and university-based breeders and researchers face in organic corn seed genetic development, this article provides an overview of intellectual property structures surrounding seed innovation and sharing. After describing the legal landscape in which organic corn seed research and development occurs, the article details research efforts exploring the veracity of claims that contractual arrangements (in the form of seed-sharing agreements between breeders and universities) stifle the innovation of organic varieties. In doing so, the article describes the search methodology utilized and highlights a critical barrier to research: the closely guarded nature of private contracts that parties are reluctant to reveal. While we were able to identify several data points that highlighted the importance of seed-sharing agreements as a part of the intellectual property regime controlling organics research and breeding, we were unable to obtain contracts or identify disputes over contractual language to further analyze. Such contractual language only becomes available upon consent and release by individual parties to the contract or by litigation that exposes the contractual language, both of which we attempted to explore and utilize. The article concludes with a discussion of why contractual arrangements in the context of organic corn seed development are an informative piece of the intellectual property puzzle worth exploring, as well as future points of research necessary to yield data substantiating the concerns of stakeholders in the organic seed industry.
AB - Private-sector dominance of plant breeding consttutes the present norm of organic seed genetics research, which has generated concerns in the organic farming community in this era of robust intellectual property protections. Intellectual property restrictions primarily in the form of certificates, patents, and contractual arrangements are blamed for stifling the innovation of organic seed varieties. To better understand the challenges small-scale and university-based breeders and researchers face in organic corn seed genetic development, this article provides an overview of intellectual property structures surrounding seed innovation and sharing. After describing the legal landscape in which organic corn seed research and development occurs, the article details research efforts exploring the veracity of claims that contractual arrangements (in the form of seed-sharing agreements between breeders and universities) stifle the innovation of organic varieties. In doing so, the article describes the search methodology utilized and highlights a critical barrier to research: the closely guarded nature of private contracts that parties are reluctant to reveal. While we were able to identify several data points that highlighted the importance of seed-sharing agreements as a part of the intellectual property regime controlling organics research and breeding, we were unable to obtain contracts or identify disputes over contractual language to further analyze. Such contractual language only becomes available upon consent and release by individual parties to the contract or by litigation that exposes the contractual language, both of which we attempted to explore and utilize. The article concludes with a discussion of why contractual arrangements in the context of organic corn seed development are an informative piece of the intellectual property puzzle worth exploring, as well as future points of research necessary to yield data substantiating the concerns of stakeholders in the organic seed industry.
KW - Breeding Networks
KW - Contracts
KW - Intellectual Property
KW - Land-Grant University
KW - Legal
KW - Open-Source Seed
KW - Organic Corn
KW - Seed Sharing
KW - Transdisciplinary Research Networks
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85168505658&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85168505658&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5304/jafscd.2023.124.012
DO - 10.5304/jafscd.2023.124.012
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85168505658
SN - 2152-0801
VL - 12
JO - Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
JF - Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
IS - 4
ER -